A critical reader of an op-ed piece who is looking for pathos is trying to find emotional appeals.
You should be an active reader if you are trying to remember the information that you are reading.
Each person has choose their own path in life.
This is a process where the reader gueses wht he is reding while he is trying to understnd wht he is reading.. in this process the reader brings prior knowledge and understading to the text he is reading........
In a way you have to decide it yourself. Ask yourself what is the book trying to tell me? In a way it's like a moral of the story
it's true
A critical reader of an op-ed piece who is looking for pathos is trying to find emotional appeals.
A critical reader looking for pathos is searching for emotional appeal in the text. They will analyze how the author uses language and examples to evoke feelings such as empathy, sympathy, or compassion in the audience. This helps to understand the emotional impact of the arguments put forward by the author.
A critical reader looking for logos is seeking logical reasoning and evidence in the text to support the argument being made. They are interested in clear and rational points that are backed up with facts, data, and examples to persuade and inform the audience effectively.
Logical arguments
As a critical reader focusing on ethos in an op-ed piece, you should pay attention to the author's credibility, expertise, and trustworthiness. Analyze how the author presents themselves to establish authority on the topic and persuade readers to trust their perspective. Look for evidence of ethical reasoning, transparency, and authenticity to evaluate the strength of the ethos in the argument.
ethos&patheos pathos apex :)
Pathos
Pathos.
Any indication of the person who wrote the document trying to hide or cover up some of the facts to distract the reader from the truth
You should be an active reader if you are trying to remember the information that you are reading.
Orwell is trying to make the reader feel like he is talking directly to them. He wants the reader to feel freedom and a desire to reach out for that freedom -
the author may not remember events correctly, he/she may only know part of the truth,The author may be trying to advance a personal bias in his or her account of the event.