Antecedents can be any noun (or noun form) where pronouns will replace the repetition of the noun. The most common pronouns that replace antecedents are personal pronouns (I, me, he, she, it, we they) or possessive adjectives (my, your, his, her, its) or possessive pronouns (his, hers, theirs, mine, yours).
The sentence with two antecedents is: "Abe and Peter gave their dog a bath." The nouns "Abe" and "Peter" are the antecedents of the pronoun "their", a possessive adjective describing the noun dog as belonging to both of them.
The pronoun is it.The antecedent is goal.
Dave and Jenny are the antecedents for the plural pronouns their, they, they, and themselves.
He loved her. She loved him. The question here demostrates how dangerous the use of pronouns without antecedents can be.
None of the above sentences use the rule correctly. Either mom or grandma will take her camera to the game tonight.
Tagalog of antecedents: mga nauna
Its the methodology that distinguishes it from its antecedents
antecedents os behaviour
precedents
Antecedents are those which come before. The term often refers to ancestors, although it can have other meanings as well. If a person is said to have ambiguous antecedents, it would mean that you really don't know what to think about that person's ancestry.
Pronouns have antecedents.
Tagalog of antecedents: mga nauna
antecedents of 1857 revolt
Yes, Afrikaners antecedents were boers.
antecedents, attribution,consequences
Yes, for instance. The conflict in Sri Lanka has its antecedents in the ancient cultural differences between the Tamil/Hindu population in the north and the Sinhalese/Buhdist population in the south.
Yes, Afrikaners antecedents were boers.