Contrary to its construction, inflammable does not mean "not flammable" : it means roughly the same thing. (able to burn)
The prefix non- is used to form nonflammable, which does mean "not flammable."
Flammable, inflammable.
Yes, oddly enough, they do mean the same thing.Normally the prefix "in" added to a word is a negative (like un) that means "not" or "unable to be". In this case the Latin intensive prefix in created inflammabilis (to inflame) from flammare (set fire to). This can be seen in the English word "inflame".The actual "not flammable" word is "nonflammable / non-flammable", or incombustible.
suffix of suit
fore-
non zero
Contrary to its construction, inflammable does not mean "not flammable" : it means roughly the same thing. (able to burn)The prefix non- is used to form nonflammable, which does mean "not flammable."
If you are talking about suffix it is -able ,but I don't know about prefix.
Inflammable.
no, its flammable.
the prefix di can be used or described as suitable and the prefix maybe can be used in divine.
Flame Flammable Flamboyant Flamin
unsuitable
Flammable, inflammable.
Señor
disembark
what is the prefix of the word respect
Yes, oddly enough, they do mean the same thing.Normally the prefix "in" added to a word is a negative (like un) that means "not" or "unable to be". In this case the Latin intensive prefix in created inflammabilis (to inflame) from flammare (set fire to). This can be seen in the English word "inflame".The actual "not flammable" word is "nonflammable / non-flammable", or incombustible.