answersLogoWhite

0

In logic, we often refer to the two broad methods of reasoning as the deductive and inductive approaches.

Deductive reasoning works from the more general to the more specific. Sometimes this is informally called a "top-down" approach. We might begin with thinking up a theoryabout our topic of interest. We then narrow that down into more specifichypotheses that we can test. We narrow down even further when we collect observations to address the hypotheses. This ultimately leads us to be able to test the hypotheses with specific data -- a confirmation (or not) of our original theories.

Inductive reasoning works the other way, moving from specific observations to broader generalizations and theories. Informally, we sometimes call this a "bottom up" approach (please note that it's "bottom up" and not"bottoms up" which is the kind of thing the bartender says to customers when he's trying to close for the night!). In inductive reasoning, we begin with specific observations and measures, begin to detect patterns and regularities, formulate some tentative hypotheses that we can explore, and finally end up developing some general conclusions or theories.

These two methods of reasoning have a very different "feel" to them when you're conducting research. Inductive reasoning, by its very nature, is more open-ended and exploratory, especially at the beginning. Deductive reasoning is more narrow in nature and is concerned with testing or confirming hypotheses. Even though a particular study may look like it's purely deductive (e.g., an experiment designed to test the hypothesized effects of some treatment on some outcome), most social research involves both inductive and deductive reasoning processes at some time in the project. In fact, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that we could assemble the two graphs above into a single circular one that continually cycles from theories down to observations and back up again to theories. Even in the most constrained experiment, the researchers may observe patterns in the data that lead them to develop new theories.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Difference between induction and deduction?

Induction is reasoning down to a set of principles, from facts. Deduction is going from a generalized down to particulars.


What is the science of deduction?

Induction in the opposite direction


Does deduction end or start with a generalization?

Deduction STARTS with a generaliztaion! Induction ENDS with a generalization!


Is 0 equals 0 deduction or induction?

Neither. It is an IDENTITY.


The building blocks of science in research-deduction and induction?

In research, deduction involves reasoning from general principles to specific conclusions, while induction involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations. Both deduction and induction are important in developing hypotheses, testing theories, and advancing scientific knowledge through logic and evidence.


What is the difference between deduction and induction in reasoning and how do they each contribute to forming conclusions?

Deduction involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises, while induction involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations or evidence. Deduction is used to ensure logical validity in reasoning, while induction is used to make generalizations based on patterns or trends. Both deduction and induction play important roles in forming conclusions by providing different ways to reason and make sense of information.


Does the Declaration of Independence use induction or deduction?

The Declaration of Independence uses DEDUCTIVE thinking


What is the difference between deduction and induction in reasoning and how do they differ in terms of their approach to forming conclusions?

Deduction involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises, using logical reasoning. Induction, on the other hand, involves forming general conclusions based on specific observations or evidence. Deduction starts with a general statement and applies it to specific cases, while induction starts with specific observations and generalizes to form a conclusion.


Using what you know to guess what happens in a story is called?

* deduction * induction * speculation


Example of different kinds of reasoning in geometry?

Intuition, induction, and deduction are types of reasoning used in geometry. Deduction uses logic to form a conclusion based on given statements.


What rhymes with suction?

abduction, conduction, construction, deduction, destruction, induction, instruction, obstruction, production, reduction, seduction


How can the principles of induction and deduction be effectively utilized in problem-solving and decision-making processes?

The principles of induction and deduction can be effectively used in problem-solving and decision-making by combining logical reasoning with evidence. Induction involves making generalizations based on specific observations, while deduction involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles. By using both methods together, individuals can analyze information, identify patterns, and make informed decisions. This approach helps in forming logical arguments and reaching sound conclusions in various situations.