Some will tell you that the double negative (didn't-- nothing) is wrong, but the truth is that the sentence is correct in certain contexts. There are some languages, French for example, where the double negative is an emphatic construction and not wrong. English is always growing and changing; perhaps the double negative will be considered formally correct one day.
I have learn what shape is a hemicycle in kindergarten.
it was very harsh on everyone. Now if you had a horse it was easier but if you didnt you had to learn the hard way.
The intransitive verb would be learn, because in this sentence learn has no direct object.
I learn about isotonic in Biology. POSERS :D
First, you learn what alliteration is. Then, you think of "launch" and how you would use it in a sentence. Then you write a sentence with "launch" and an alliteration of it.
nothing! they didnt have school back then!
they didnt learn anything
they didnt learn anything
no geodude cant learn flash. i tried it and it didnt work
he didnt
The future tense form of the verb "to learn" in that sentence would be "will learn." So the revised sentence is "you will learn about verbs."
Most likely, it evolved too late to learn it.
we can learn nothing
seals learn that nothing
I didnt like how you didnt learn much about Edwards family. :( But the rest of the book is awsome!
The future tense of the sentence "Are you ready to learn about verbs?" would be "Will you be ready to learn about verbs?"
No, "How quickly you learn" is a sentence fragment. It lacks a subject and verb to make it a complete sentence.