One benefit is that paraphrasing sounds more natural. When you speak or write using someone else's words, it doesn't sound like you, and can be a little weird for people to hear or read who are used to your voice.
Exactly how u spelled it: Paraphrasing
you can incorporate more of your own writing voice into the paper
paraphrasing
Paraphrasing allows the author to maintain control of the material.
The process of using questioning and paraphrasing messages is a type of
A bird landed on the path was the paraphrasing of "a bird came down the walk."
Exactly how u spelled it: Paraphrasing
you can incorporate more of your own writing voice into the paper
One primary difference is that feedback involves providing a response or reaction to a specific message or behavior, while paraphrasing focuses on restating information in one's own words. Feedback can involve expressing opinions or judgments, whereas paraphrasing aims to clarify and confirm understanding without adding personal input.
paraphrasing
It would be paraphrasing.
When paraphrasing, the reader restates what he has read, but putting it into his own words.
Not really. It all depends on what it is though. Paraphrasing is changing it enough to make it mean the same thing but sound different. I usually try to change most words or quote the person( if it is an interview)
The difference between paraphrasing and quoting is that paraphrasing is giving a brief summary of what was said. Quoting is repeating the exact words that were said.
paraphrasing
C. paraphrasing
Answer B is the best to describe paraphrasing. Paraphrasing is reading something and then rewriting it in your own words. It can help clear up any wordiness or misunderstanding from the original material, and it also helps with avoiding plagiarism. Answer A is not paraphrasing because the original material is spoken, not written. If it were a written speech that Janette was reading, she could be paraphrasing.