Nature has to do with genetics, heredity, and human evolution. Some things are inherent in all humans and other things are inherited from other people in your family. These are the things you are born with, whereas nurture is that which you are taught after birth.
The age-old debate of nature versus nurture consists of arguments for and against the extent to which our personalities are a result of Biology or society. The nature aspect is in regards to what we are naturally born with, what is already ingrained in our brains. If this is true, everything about your personality, from your intelligence to your favorite food is a result of your brain chemistry. The nurture aspect is in regards to how society and the people surrounding you affect who you are. If this is to be taken as true, your personality traits are a result of your experiences, developed over time. It is not uncommon for scientists or the general public to agree with a balance of both nature and nurture.
Specifically in terms of intelligence, it is hard to say whether or not you are born with a high IQ or if it is learned. Some children seem to have a natural aptitude for quick-learning and memory. Is this a result of a parent's nurturing or has nature granted them a "gift"? There have been studies on this, including some that compare parents' intelligence with their adopted children and biologically-related children. There has not been, however, any conclusive evidence of either argument and the issue has been debated for decades. It is a difficult subject to measure because it has so many variables.
Some behaviors can be attributed to nature rather than nurture. Example: A spider knows how to release its web and take off after hatching. This is nature, because it has not experienced this from nurturing. On the other hand, a baby Chimpanzee is shy because his mother is protective. This is nurture, because the baby learns social roles from its mother.
The theme of a story is the 'meaning' or 'philosophy' that the story is trying to convey. For example the novel 'Frankenstein' is an argument in the 'nature vs nurture' controversy with the story coming down heavily on the nurture side.
The direct opposite of nurture would be to deprive or oppress. The condition that is opposite is the lack of nurturing, which is to neglect or ignore.In debates over human behavior, the opposite influence to nurture is "nature" (nature vs nurture), natural behavior being instinctive rather than learned.
A person's genres or upbringing are more important. :)
What message or truth or philosophical point the story conveys, expresses, or illustrates. The themes of Frankenstein is Nurture is more important than Nature, and, Obsessions are bad.
Heres a sentence: Can you define controversy? or There is a controversy going on about President Obama.
The controversy of "nature vs. nurture" is basically about behavior and learning. The question is simply this: Do people act in a certain way because of instinct or is it because of how he or she was raised?
Answer = Tabula rasa- Apex
The central issues of the nature-nurture controversy revolve around the debate of whether genetics (nature) or environment and experiences (nurture) have a greater influence on individual development and behavior. This ongoing debate seeks to understand the relative contributions of genetic inheritance and environmental factors in shaping human traits and capabilities. The controversy plays a significant role in fields such as psychology, biology, and philosophy.
Epigenetics in psychology refers to the study of how environmental factors can influence gene expression and behavior without changing the underlying DNA sequence. This field explores how experiences such as stress, trauma, or parenting can lead to changes in gene activity that may affect mental health, cognition, and overall psychological well-being.
The name of this controversy is Nurture Vs Nature.
Some (nature) believe that our behaviors more are innate, while others (nurture) believe that our environment, our peers, etc. shape our behaviors more.
Nature versus nurture.
Plato's assumption that certain ideas are inborn is most directly relevant to the controversy regarding nature versus nurture, specifically the question of whether knowledge and understanding are innate or acquired through experience and education.
Plato's assumption that certain ideas are inborn is most directly relevant to the controversy regarding the nature of knowledge acquisition and the existence of innate knowledge versus knowledge based on experience. It raises questions about the origins of our understanding, the role of prior knowledge in learning, and the extent to which knowledge is pre-existing within the individual.
One key issue in the nature vs nurture controversy from a sociology perspective is the impact of socialization on human behavior. Sociologists argue that while genetic factors (nature) play a role, environmental influences such as family, peers, schools, and culture (nurture) also shape an individual's development and behavior. Understanding how social forces interact with biological factors is crucial in explaining human behavior and social outcomes.
Nature vs. nurture is a long-standing debate in psychology that focuses on the relative importance of genetic inheritance (nature) and environmental influences (nurture) in shaping human behavior and development. It examines how genetics and upbringing interact to influence psychological traits and behaviors.
The theme of a story is the 'meaning' or 'philosophy' that the story is trying to convey. For example the novel 'Frankenstein' is an argument in the 'nature vs nurture' controversy with the story coming down heavily on the nurture side.