The noun clause in the given sentence is "that he would use up his inheritance".
This relative clause functions as an appositive (a word or phrase renaming something earlier in the sentence). This relative clause 'relates' to the noun 'worry', the subject of the sentence.
The word 'elf' is a noun; a word for a person.A noun functions as the subject of a sentence or clause, and as the object of a verb or a preposition.Examples:An elf sat on a rock by the pond. (subject of the sentence)I didn't recognize the song that the elf sang. (subject of the relative clause)We watched the elf as he did a little dance. (direct object of the verb 'watched')We never spoke to the elf. (object of the preposition 'to')
Michael, who was turning twenty next week, was planning his birthday party. As simply as I can put it: * the clause is generally characterised by and found between commas. * it is an extra bit of information, and can't be a stand alone sentence. * if you remove the clause, the remaining sentence still makes sense: Michael was planning his birthday party. Doing Latin really helps with this sort of stuff; for some reason my secondary school English teachers never really teach me this stuff.
sentence do you use fixed expenses in a sentence? that's a sentence^
It is both a question AND a sentence.
He never lied, did he?
appositive
appositive A+
In the sentence, the noun clause "that he would use up his inheritance" acts as the subject complement, providing additional information about "Brad's one worry." It specifies the content of his worry, indicating what he was concerned about. The clause functions as a noun, as it can be replaced with a single noun without altering the sentence's meaning.
The noun clause in the given sentence is "that he would use up his inheritance", a relative clause which relates to the subject noun "worry".
The noun clause in the given sentence is "that he would use up his inheritance", a relative clause which relates to the subject noun "worry".
The sentence contains the relative clause "that he would use up his inheritance", which relates to the subject noun "worry".
This sentence is a complex sentence because it contains an independent clause ("Steven thought the hour would never end") and a dependent clause ("Steven thought"). The dependent clause cannot stand alone as a complete sentence.
The sentence "Steven thought the hour would never end" is a complex sentence. It contains a main clause ("Steven thought") and a subordinate clause ("the hour would never end"). The subordinate clause acts as the object of the main clause, providing additional information about Steven's thoughts. Overall, it effectively conveys a complete idea regarding Steven's perception of time.
You should never squander your money. He had a big inheritance but decided to squander it by gambling with it.
appositive
The main clause is a clause that can form a complete sentence standing alone, having a subject and a predicate, and on which depend other clauses, it can never be subordinate clause, while a superordinate clause can be in the same time superordinate and subordiante at the same time. 1-main clause/superordinate (is super because the second depends on it) 2- subordinate/superordinate clause, 3- subordinate clause, which depends on dhe second, that's why the second one is also superordinated.
The word 'elf' is a noun; a word for a person.A noun functions as the subject of a sentence or clause, and as the object of a verb or a preposition.Examples:An elf sat on a rock by the pond. (subject of the sentence)I didn't recognize the song that the elf sang. (subject of the relative clause)We watched the elf as he did a little dance. (direct object of the verb 'watched')We never spoke to the elf. (object of the preposition 'to')