The noun clause in the given sentence is "that he would use up his inheritance".
This relative clause functions as an appositive (a word or phrase renaming something earlier in the sentence). This relative clause 'relates' to the noun 'worry', the subject of the sentence.
The noun clause in the given sentence is "that he would use up his inheritance", a relative clause which relates to the subject noun "worry".
The word 'elf' is a noun; a word for a person.A noun functions as the subject of a sentence or clause, and as the object of a verb or a preposition.Examples:An elf sat on a rock by the pond. (subject of the sentence)I didn't recognize the song that the elf sang. (subject of the relative clause)We watched the elf as he did a little dance. (direct object of the verb 'watched')We never spoke to the elf. (object of the preposition 'to')
sentence do you use fixed expenses in a sentence? that's a sentence^
It is both a question AND a sentence.
Michael, who was turning twenty next week, was planning his birthday party. As simply as I can put it: * the clause is generally characterised by and found between commas. * it is an extra bit of information, and can't be a stand alone sentence. * if you remove the clause, the remaining sentence still makes sense: Michael was planning his birthday party. Doing Latin really helps with this sort of stuff; for some reason my secondary school English teachers never really teach me this stuff.
He never lied, did he?
appositive
appositive A+
The noun clause in the given sentence is "that he would use up his inheritance", a relative clause which relates to the subject noun "worry".
The noun clause in the given sentence is "that he would use up his inheritance", a relative clause which relates to the subject noun "worry".
The sentence contains the relative clause "that he would use up his inheritance", which relates to the subject noun "worry".
You should never squander your money. He had a big inheritance but decided to squander it by gambling with it.
appositive
The main clause is a clause that can form a complete sentence standing alone, having a subject and a predicate, and on which depend other clauses, it can never be subordinate clause, while a superordinate clause can be in the same time superordinate and subordiante at the same time. 1-main clause/superordinate (is super because the second depends on it) 2- subordinate/superordinate clause, 3- subordinate clause, which depends on dhe second, that's why the second one is also superordinated.
The word 'elf' is a noun; a word for a person.A noun functions as the subject of a sentence or clause, and as the object of a verb or a preposition.Examples:An elf sat on a rock by the pond. (subject of the sentence)I didn't recognize the song that the elf sang. (subject of the relative clause)We watched the elf as he did a little dance. (direct object of the verb 'watched')We never spoke to the elf. (object of the preposition 'to')
You use a comma with because when you are using it as the beginning of a dependent clause or modifying clause. For exampleBecause Latoya was allergic to shrimp, Laquetta opted to make steak for the dinner party.orUncle Joe, because of his demetia, accidentally confused me with the grim reaper, subsequently opting to throw a bag of potato chips at my head.BECAUSE IS NOT A CONJUCTION...CONSEQUENTLY IT SHOULD NEVER BE USED AS ONE. THESE ARE THE TWO GENERALLY ACCEPTED USES FOR COMMAS AND BECAUSE.In fact, it's easier to just remember that you NEVER use a comma before the word "because". In the example above, the comma follows the dependent clause. It does not precede it and never should. "Because" ALWAYS introduces a dependent clause and should NEVER have a comma before it. Here's the rule: Independent clause + dependent clause = no comma.Dependent clause + independent clause = comma AFTER the dependent clause.
There is a subtle but important difference between the use of that and which in a sentence, and it has to do primarily with relevance. Grammarians often use the terms "restrictive" and "non-restrictive" when it comes to relative clauses. A relative clause provides additional information about the noun it describes, but it may be considered relevant or irrelevant to the overall point of the sentence. In other words, a restrictive relative clause, which often begins with that, is usually considered essential or restrictive. Relative clauses beginning with which may contain non-essential information and would be considered non-restrictive.Or simply: Use which when it introduces a new clause in the same sentence. Use that when it begins a new sentence. Thus we say "You never know, which is why..." and we say "You never know. That is why..."
The clause is "since you never miss a sale at the bakery." The other adverb is obviously.