The subject of the second sentence cannot be implied in English
I'm. it has two letters so i guess it is tied with "go" as a sentence (my friend says go is because technically it has an implied subject) if either are legal sentences, and I'm not sure if go is because the definition of sentence I heard was a subject and a verb so if you count the contraction 'm (am) as a verb than these two are tied."I am" or "I do" would be the shortest sentences in the English language.The imperatives Be, Do, and Go may be complete sentences.No.It would be an imperative sentence, so that the subject is implied. This way the sentence can consist of only the verb: "Go."
no, because without a verb it will make no senseIn some sentences, the verb is implied: Do you understand? --> Yes.In the single-word reply "I understand" is implied because it is understood from context.Understand is a verb. eg Do you understand?Exclamations don't have verbs:How quick!, what a shame, How wonderful!
That phrase is a fallacy. - Evidence is a fact. If it is only 'implied' then it can not be evidence.
The definite article is 'the' in all sentences or where ever it is used. It's the only definite article in English.
The nouns in the sentence are: nouns and sentence.
"Why?" is not a sentence, because It does not have either a subject or verb. It is acceptable only for informal usage. The general rule in English is that a sentence may imply either a subject or a verb, but not both. As others have suggested, "Go!" can qualify as a sentence. The subject (you, the listener) is implied, but the verb, "go," is stated. So it can be a sentence. Another sentence of the same type is, "You!" which means, "You are the one." In this example the subject, "you," is stated, so the sentence only has to imply the verb, "are." With "Why?" however, both the subject and the verb are implied. When written by itself, "why?" usually means either, "Why should I do that?" or "Why do you think that?" Those have subjects and verbs (I and do, or you and think). Since both have to be implied here, "Why?" by itself, is acceptable only in speech and in informal writing.
The dividant expression on his face implied that he was the only one aware of the situation.
The topic which is only suggested by supporting detail,not clearly stated in one sentence.
No, you can not. Now in Latin you might. For example, amat (amo, amare, amavi, amatus to love), means he loves. Now this could be consideratered a particle sentence, but in English you have to supply the "he". In English imperative sentences usually have no subject - the subject is implied 'you' - and they can be only a verb eg Sit down! Standup! Look out!
I'm. it has two letters so i guess it is tied with "go" as a sentence (my friend says go is because technically it has an implied subject) if either are legal sentences, and I'm not sure if go is because the definition of sentence I heard was a subject and a verb so if you count the contraction 'm (am) as a verb than these two are tied."I am" or "I do" would be the shortest sentences in the English language.The imperatives Be, Do, and Go may be complete sentences.No.It would be an imperative sentence, so that the subject is implied. This way the sentence can consist of only the verb: "Go."
Yes, that is true. A complete sentence can be just a pronoun with a verb. In fact, a complete sentence can be just the verb where the subject (noun or pronoun) is implied. Such a sentence is usually an exclamatory sentence.Examples:Look. (the implied subject is 'you' or the person's name)John came. (subject and verb only)He came. (subject and verb only)Maggie made the cake. She did.
no, because without a verb it will make no senseIn some sentences, the verb is implied: Do you understand? --> Yes.In the single-word reply "I understand" is implied because it is understood from context.Understand is a verb. eg Do you understand?Exclamations don't have verbs:How quick!, what a shame, How wonderful!
There was only ever implied to be relationship tension between Knuckles and Rouge in Sonic Adventure 2. Since that point on Rouge has been implied to be with Shadow (though it is implied more to be a hetero life partners thing than a relationship thing).
That phrase is a fallacy. - Evidence is a fact. If it is only 'implied' then it can not be evidence.
was it a car or a cat i saw . .wasitacaroracatisaw. . ~ the only English sentence that has exactly the same words even if you read it reversely ! :)
That phrase is a fallacy. - Evidence is a fact. If it is only 'implied' then it can not be evidence.
Henry VIII