The prefix of "measurable" is "measur-." In this case, "measur-" is derived from the root word "measure," which means to determine the size, amount, or degree of something. When the prefix "measur-" is added to the root word "able," it forms the word "measurable," which means capable of being measured or quantified.
The correct spelling of the adjective, from measure, is measurable (weighable, quantifiable).
"Measurable" is an adjective, and English adjectives do not distinguish between plural and singular.
You could describe any measurable characteristic as a trait.
Prefix=IN
Yes, prefix does have a prefix. The prefix is pur-.
Un
The correct spelling of the adjective, from measure, is measurable (weighable, quantifiable).
Yes.
Measurable data is data that can be measure by a quantity. Measurable data is also known as quantitative data.
yes.since this functin is simple .and evry simple function is measurable if and ond only if its domain (in this question one set) is measurable.
The data collected does not have to be measurable.
We need measurable criteria to assess your progress.
Yes, the inverse image of a measurable set under a continuous map is measurable. If ( f: X \to Y ) is a continuous function and ( A \subseteq Y ) is a measurable set, then the preimage ( f^{-1}(A) ) is measurable in ( X ). This property holds for various types of measurable spaces, including Borel and Lebesgue measurability. Thus, continuous functions preserve the measurability of sets through their inverse images.
The correct spelling is measurable and not measureable.
"Measurable" is an adjective, and English adjectives do not distinguish between plural and singular.
You could describe any measurable characteristic as a trait.
Possibly under certain conditions, but not generally. Consider a nonmeasurable set A, and define f(x) = 1 if x in A 0 otherwise. Then {1} is certainly measurable but the inverse image {x | f(x) = 1} = A is not measurable.