In the word "animal," the schwa syllable is the second syllable, which is the "i" sound. The schwa is a mid-central vowel sound that is unstressed and often occurs in unstressed syllables in English words. In this case, the schwa sound is represented by the letter "i" in the second syllable of "animal."
That is right; the second syllable is pronounced with a schwa.
No it does not "Ag-ree" their is NO schwa sound at the end
Yes, the second syllable of "region" is unstressed and has a schwa sound.
This depends on your pronunciation. For me there is no schwa in composition. But some people might pronounce the 'o' in the second syllable - po - as a schwa. The words herd or bird have a schwa in them. (for my pronunciation).
Yes. The first syllable has an unstressed (schwa) sound. The A sounds like "uh."
The second and third
It is in the last syllable, -a is a schwa.
In the word "emotion," the schwa syllable falls on the first syllable: e-MOH-shun. The schwa sound is represented by the "uh" sound in this word.
It is in the second syllable: -a is a schwa.
That is right; the second syllable is pronounced with a schwa.
The schwa is the upside-down 'e' in phonics, and is used for vowels that makes sounds that are not their long and short sounds. I believe the schwa in 'syllable' is the 'a.' (Sil-AH-bohl).
In the majority pronunciation, the second syllable has a schwa. However, there are some pronunciations where the first and second syllable have the same vowel sound (like "u" in bus), and these pronunciation does not have a schwa.
Yes. In the word 'given', the schwa occurs on the 'en' syllable.
Yes. In the word 'given', the schwa occurs on the 'en' syllable.
No. The syllable -ive is usually considered a short I, not a schwa.
Yes, but the actual schwa depends on the pronunciation used: 1) MAH-muh (as in momma) has the schwa as the second syllable (unstressed). 2) muh-MAH (informal, affected) has the schwa as the first syllable (unstressed).
Second syllable.