answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Why was sodom destroyed is it because gay acts?

Based on Christian interpretation, yes. Based on Jewish interpretation, no.


Which power is often controversial because they are based on interpretation?

The power of judicial review is often controversial because it relies heavily on the interpretation of laws and the Constitution. Courts, particularly the Supreme Court, can determine the constitutionality of legislative and executive actions, which can lead to significant political and social implications. This interpretative nature can result in varying outcomes based on the judges' philosophies and perspectives, leading to debates over judicial activism versus restraint. Such decisions can provoke strong reactions from different political factions and the public.


Was Jefferson's purchase of Louisiana based on A loose or strict interpretation of the constitution?

It was based on a loose interpretation of the Constitution because he wasn't really allowed to by the land, and he had to justify his actions by his hopes for the nation


Did Thomas Jefferson have a strict or loose interpretation of the constitution?

It was based on a loose interpretation of the Constitution because he wasn't really allowed to by the land, and he had to justify his actions by his hopes for the nation


Who hears cases based on inherent and delegated powers?

A tribal court hears cases based on inherent and delegated powers. Inherent powers are the powers that congress is assumed to have because they result logically from the powers expressly listed in the U.S. Constitution. Delegated powers are powers specifically granted to congress by article I, section 8 of the constitution.


Which powers are easier to challenge expressed powers or implied powers And why?

Implied powers are generally easier to challenge than expressed powers because they are not explicitly stated in the Constitution, leading to more interpretation and debate about their scope and limits. Since implied powers derive from the Necessary and Proper Clause, their application can vary based on differing judicial interpretations and political contexts. This ambiguity allows for greater contention in courts and among lawmakers regarding their legitimacy and extent. In contrast, expressed powers are clearly defined, making them more straightforward to uphold or contest.


On what must the exercise of implied powers be based?

Must be based on one of the expressed powers.


Why is consideration of intentions important in conflict situation?

People respond based on their interpretation of others' intentions.


Why is Scientific knowledge not possible through the act of perception?

Because knowledge is based on evidence, perception is not. (Although that does depend on the interpretation of the wrod "perception")


Since the description of the presidency given in article 2 is sketchy it has been used as what of presidential powers?

The sketchy description of the presidency in Article II of the U.S. Constitution has led to its interpretation as a source of implied powers for the president. This ambiguity allows presidents to expand their authority through executive actions, orders, and other means, often justifying their actions based on the need for effective governance. Consequently, the lack of detailed constraints has fostered a more dynamic and sometimes contentious interpretation of presidential powers over time.


Is interpretation a verb?

No. Interpretation is a noun, based on the verb "to interpret."


How does congress get implied powers?

based on at least one of the expressed powers