Ignore any good argument stratagies - APEX
A conclusion should summarize the main points of the paper by rephrasing them in shorter sentences.
The main points of the presentation
a summary of the main points
ideas that support the author's main idea.
the main points of the story the lesson learned and or the authors point of view
When doing analyzing supporting details include facts, specific ideas, and the points of information. The meaning of words does not need to be included when analyzing supporting details.
When evaluating products, services, and health information, one should consider the source of the information as well as determine the validity of the supporting documentation.
You should ask yourself what is the purpose of the information when evaluating an advertisement.
Supporting material for each key point can be obtained by using: Examples Stories Quotations Findings Comparisons
You should ask yourself if the speech is persuasive because of valid points, or because of grandstanding, prevaricating, or other rhetorical devices.
To effectively score points in Bananagrams, players should focus on creating longer words, using all their tiles quickly, and rearranging their words to maximize points. Additionally, players should pay attention to the words their opponents are creating and try to block them from completing their words.
When creating an outline, you should decide on the logical flow of information. Start with a clear introduction, followed by supporting points in a logical order, and end with a conclusion that summarizes the main points. The order in which information appears in the outline should help effectively convey your main ideas.
You should ask yourself what is the purpose of the information when evaluating an advertisement.
Significant points will get lost in the maze of rambling information if too much supporting material is presented. On the other hand, a presentation will not be convincing if too little supporting material to substantiate key points
To analyze a debate, you should evaluate the arguments presented by each side, assess the evidence supporting those arguments, consider the logical reasoning used, and scrutinize the overall persuasiveness of the debaters. It is important to look at the structure of the debate, including how well each team responds to their opponents' points and how effectively they engage with the topic at hand.
I like to befriend my opponents to physch them out....
One example of a question to ask when evaluating a persuasive speech is: "Is the evidence presented in the speech credible and supported by reliable sources?" This helps to assess the strength of the argument and determine if it is based on solid evidence.