Ignore any good argument stratagies - APEX
A conclusion should summarize the main points of the paper by rephrasing them in shorter sentences.
The main points of the presentation
When revising a draft, a writer should ensure that the supporting details in a paragraph are relevant, coherent, and effectively illustrate the main idea. Each detail should clearly connect back to the topic sentence and enhance the reader's understanding of the argument or narrative. Additionally, it's important to check for variety in the types of supporting details used, such as examples, statistics, or anecdotes, to maintain reader engagement. Lastly, the overall flow and organization of the paragraph should be smooth, allowing for a logical progression of ideas.
a summary of the main points
The last step when evaluating writing with a general rubric is to provide constructive feedback based on the scores and observations gathered during the evaluation process. This feedback should highlight strengths and areas for improvement, guiding the writer on how to enhance their work. Additionally, it may involve discussing the overall effectiveness of the writing in relation to its intended purpose and audience.
When doing analyzing supporting details include facts, specific ideas, and the points of information. The meaning of words does not need to be included when analyzing supporting details.
When evaluating products, services, and health information, one should consider the source of the information as well as determine the validity of the supporting documentation.
Supporting material for each key point can be obtained by using: Examples Stories Quotations Findings Comparisons
You should ask yourself what is the purpose of the information when evaluating an advertisement.
You should ask yourself if the speech is persuasive because of valid points, or because of grandstanding, prevaricating, or other rhetorical devices.
To effectively score points in Bananagrams, players should focus on creating longer words, using all their tiles quickly, and rearranging their words to maximize points. Additionally, players should pay attention to the words their opponents are creating and try to block them from completing their words.
When creating an outline, you should decide on the logical flow of information. Start with a clear introduction, followed by supporting points in a logical order, and end with a conclusion that summarizes the main points. The order in which information appears in the outline should help effectively convey your main ideas.
To analyze a debate, you should evaluate the arguments presented by each side, assess the evidence supporting those arguments, consider the logical reasoning used, and scrutinize the overall persuasiveness of the debaters. It is important to look at the structure of the debate, including how well each team responds to their opponents' points and how effectively they engage with the topic at hand.
Significant points will get lost in the maze of rambling information if too much supporting material is presented. On the other hand, a presentation will not be convincing if too little supporting material to substantiate key points
You should ask yourself what is the purpose of the information when evaluating an advertisement.
I like to befriend my opponents to physch them out....
Not if you want to win a round. You should be paying attention to everything that goes on in round and create a summary of your most important points and why your most important points are more important than your opponents most important points. 4th speakers don't SPEAK! they write rebuttal! they right little debate on some of the points the other teams said.