The theory of Moral Criticism seeks to address the effect/influence that the literature has on the morals of the reader, whether for good or bad.
In order to identify which type of theory it is, lets consider brief definitions of the theories offered:
While each of these theories approach the matter from different perspectives, option C, Rhetorical Criticism, seems to match the criteria because it considers the effect that the piece of literature has on the reader or audience. But not all literature that affects the morals of the reader is presented by the use of rhetoric, or rhetorical devices. Therefore the theory of Moral Criticism does not, at first glance, appear to be a rhetorical type of theory.
However, the theory of rhetorical criticism uses 'rhetorical' in a sense different to the one normally understood. Rhetorical criticism assesses how well the writer's 'symbols' (including 'words') affect the reader. Therefore Moral criticism, which evaluates how well the literature, obviously including its words ('symbols'), affects (influences the morality of) the reader, is clearly a Rhetorical type of criticism, and answer 'C. Rhetorical' would be the correct answer.
When islam spread,the ignorance of arab will finished.
Essays are always formal.
Formal is an adjective.
A semi-formal meeting the public is typically invited to attend and listen to the speakers. Semi-formal meetings use some of the procedures of a formal meeting.
A formal disapproval is a reprimand.
Formal, sociocultural, and expressive
Nothing.
The two kinds of modern criticism are formal criticism, which focuses on the analysis of the structure and style of a work, and thematic criticism, which delves into the underlying themes and messages within a work. Formal criticism examines how a piece of literature is constructed, while thematic criticism explores the meanings and ideas conveyed within the work.
Formal criticism refers to the analysis and evaluation of a work of art or literature based on its formal elements such as structure, style, and technique. It often focuses on objective observations and interpretations of these elements to provide insight into the artistic merit and overall effectiveness of the work. Formal criticism aims to deepen understanding and appreciation of the artistic process and creative choices made by the artist.
Sensory, formal, technical, expressive, and reflective
"Hollered" is an informal word that is often used to convey a sense of urgency, emotion, or informality in communication. It can be more expressive and authentic in capturing the intensity of the moment compared to a more formal word.
One frequent criticism of formal planning is that it can be rigid and inflexible, making it difficult to adapt to changes in the dynamic business environment. Critics argue that formal planning often involves extensive time and resources, yet may not always lead to practical implementation or desired outcomes. Additionally, some believe that an overemphasis on planning can stifle creativity and innovation within an organization.
State legislatures, rather than convention delegates elected by the people, often ratify amendments.
Some rhetorical strategies of tone include the use of humor to lighten the mood, using a formal tone to convey seriousness, adjusting the pace of speech to create tension or emphasize key points, and employing repetition to reinforce a message or make a point more memorable. Each of these strategies can help persuade or engage an audience by shaping the emotional response to the message.
Censure is a formal expression of disapproval or criticism towards someone or something, typically by a governing body or authority. It is a way to publicly condemn or rebuke actions considered to be improper or unacceptable.
Feedback is a specific response to a performance or behavior, focusing on what was done well and what could be improved. Evaluation, on the other hand, involves a more formal assessment of overall performance or quality, often with a rating or score. Both can provide constructive criticism, but feedback is more immediate and focused on specific actions, while evaluation is broader and more formal.
"now the trumpet summons us again" "to assist free men and free government in casting off the chains of poverty"