EITHER USAGE IS CORRECT. The choice is yours.
Unavailability.
Name unavailable
Yes it's the abbreviation of versus so it should have a fullstop after it.
There are two ways to abbreviate "versus," vs. or v.
Both "v." and "vs." are accepted abbreviations of versus. It's a matter of personal choice which one you use. However, in legal cases like "Roe v. Wade", "v." is preferred. In sports competitions, "vs." is more common.
Un- is the most common prefix for available, creating the word unavailable. It means not handy or not obtainable.
If a game is unavailable it is Nintendo's choice to make t available again.
This question is kind of weird. HEEHEE
Unavailable.
Unavailability.
Some common prefixes that can be added to "available" are "un" (unavailable) and "un-" (unavailable). Common suffixes that can be added to "available" are "-able" (available) and "-ability" (availability).
Which are still unavailable?
No esta libre (He/she is not free) = he/she is unavailable Ne es disponible = it is not available
The internet service is currently unavailable.
Both "will be unavailable" and "will not be available" essentially convey the same meaning that something will not be accessible in the future. Both are correct and can be used interchangeably.
It depends on the context. Someone may be unavailable because they are away for some reason. A service may be unavailable due to technical difficulties. An item may be unavailable because it is out of stock.
Name unavailable