It will follow a proper noun
idk
The clause "who can cook " is basically an adjective clause because it refers to a noun.For example:The pilot who can cook prepared the food for the survivors." who can cook " refers to pilot.*The question is also whether it is a restrictive or non-restrictive clause. If the pilot is the only one of the pilots who can cook, it is a restrictive clause (the one who can). If the pilot just happens to be able to cook, it is a non-restrictive clause set off by commas, e.g.The pilot, who can cook, prepared the food for the survivors.
The adjectives in that sentence are "Korean" and "spicy". "that serve spicy dishes such as kimchi" also serves as an adjectival clause.
No, it is not. It is a conjunction, used to connect a restrictive dependent clause.* uses that are a preposition are practically unseen in modern English
"You played tennis anyway" is the independent clause; "although it was raining" is the dependent clause. An independent clause can stand on its own as a sentence, but a dependent clause cannot be a sentence.
A clause that can stand alone as a sentence
Adjectival
In restrictive clauses, use 'that' to define a specific characteristic or condition of the noun being referred to. Use 'which' in non-restrictive clauses to provide additional information that is not essential to the meaning of the sentence.
Independent, dependent, adjectival, adverbial
The Commerce Clause can apply to a business that only does business in one state.
The other name for a relative clause is an adjective clause.
The clause "who can cook " is basically an adjective clause because it refers to a noun.For example:The pilot who can cook prepared the food for the survivors." who can cook " refers to pilot.*The question is also whether it is a restrictive or non-restrictive clause. If the pilot is the only one of the pilots who can cook, it is a restrictive clause (the one who can). If the pilot just happens to be able to cook, it is a non-restrictive clause set off by commas, e.g.The pilot, who can cook, prepared the food for the survivors.
"That". In a non-restrictive adjective clause, such as in the sentence: "He went to the Eiffel Tower, which is located in Paris." The non-restrictive adjective clause, "which is located in Paris", called non-restrictive because it does not serve to improve the identification of the Eiffel Tower or "restrict" the meaning of it, contains the adjective clause pronoun "which". The reader would know what the Eiffel Tower was referring to even without the adjective clause because there is only one Eiffel Tower. This is what makes the adjective clause non-restrictive - not improving the identification of the noun. One could not use "that" in place of "which" because "that" is only used to alter or restrict the meaning of the noun. Here is an example of a restrictive adjective clause using "that": "I went to the store that is on the corner of Sunset and Vine." In this sentence the adjective clause, "that is on the corner of Sunset and Vine", restricts which store we are referring to, to the one "that is on the corner of Sunset and Vine" and not the one on Main and Third Streets. Thus it is called a restrictive clause. In restrictive clauses, one can use "that" and any of the other adjective clause pronouns: who, whom, which, where, when.
"If" is not a conjunction; it is a subordinating conjunction that introduces a conditional clause.
limits the meaning of the word it describes I THINK...
i think it like written or words
That is a relative clause, specifically a restrictive relative clause, providing essential information about the type of clause being discussed.
Use a comma before "where" when it introduces a non-restrictive clause (provides additional, non-essential information) and omit the comma when "where" introduces a restrictive clause (essential for the sentence's meaning). For example, "I went to the park, where I often walk my dog" (non-restrictive) vs. "I will meet you at the park where we first met" (restrictive).