The oiler died because Crane was trying to make a point about humankind and nature. Crane was writing during the Naturalistic time period (a branch off of realism). He supported the idea that Nature was a strong, powerful force that could do whatever it wanted. No matter how much we prayed, fought, or were fit physically to survive, it didn't matter. Nature could do whatever she wanted. In this story, the oiler, who is the most logical person to survive, dies. He is physically fit, and seems strong in his escapade towards the shore. It is shocking when the reader notices that the cook (who counted on the ocean to paddle his body-canoe to shore), the injured captain, and the lucky correspondent who catches a life-saving wave to shallow water all survive rather than the oiler. This proves that Nature doesn't always pick through Darwinism, and may simply chose by manner of chance. Why? Because it can.
She was shot.
Erika did die and I am pretty sure she died from namonia :(
they died because their boat crashed and from the storm and they all drowned.
13. DIE-NO-MORE-SAW
No, he does not die. He leaves the body he is in and returns to his home. It just looks as if he is dying.
The only person to die was the Oiler and he was the healthiest of the lot.
he died in 1611. The crew of his final expedition mutinied and cast him adrift in an open boat. His fate is unknown
He died on his boat.
No they would crack their head open and die
she died when she was on a boat
DIE
Mike Davis - boat builder - died in 2008.
John Spencer - boat designer - died in 1996.
In the short story "The Veldt" by Ray Bradbury, the parents do not explicitly die at the end. However, there are hints that the children's control over the technology in the nursery may lead to their demise. It is left open to interpretation.
in the boat
Die
he was going to the Massachusetts in a boat but the boat sank but some people think the boat did not sink her father just abandoned Deborah's faimly