individuals do not evolve
Logic tells me it is not correct since "suffice" is a synonym of sufficient. You would never say "sufficient it to say" would you. So why say "suffice it to say"?
"The crowd cheered the winners, her and me." It is incorrect in this context to say "she and I" and it is always incorrect to say "her and I." You can use "her and me" anywhere that you would use "us," and you can use "she and I" anywhere that you would use "we."
Too perfect is incorrect because there are no degrees of perfection.
Not incorrect grammatically, but whoever you say that to might think you're laying it on a bit thick.
Informal but not incorrect. In formal writing, use the simple future, You will never go.
individuals do not evolve
individuals do not evolve
It's incorrect to say that you are "envolving" during your life because the correct term is "evolving." Evolving implies a gradual development or change, while envolving is not a recognized term in English.
To be incorrect is avoir faute
you cannot say "he have" this is incorrect, it is " he has"
Since society and humankind are constantly evolving, so must our democracy.
It is grammatically incorrect to say sister and sister. You just say sisters.
What? _____ is evolving!
No, it is not incorrect. You could say, "These ones are the best for baking."
It would not be a complete sentence but, there is nothing inherently grammatically incorrect in the phrase "during the all period". What you have is a reference to a period of time called "the all". Just because nobody knows what "The All" is doesn't make this grammatically incorrect.
Longevity means long life.So 'Longevity of life in the country...' means 'Long life of life in the country ....'!It is sufficient to say "Longevity in the country is increasing."Adding 'of life' is tautology. It is unnecessary ... and incorrect.
No. This is incorrect. We always say 'India has".