answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The more sources there are to corroborate a conclusion, the more likely that conclusion is to be true.

-Apex

User Avatar

Casey Corwin

Lvl 10
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

Xavier Arndt

Lvl 1
2y ago
Thank youuuu
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

6y ago

To corroborate a primary source's claim about an event n…

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

B

Lvl 3
1y ago

To corroborate a primary source's claim about an event

apex

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

6y ago

To be sure the information is reliable. You need to look for a pattern and if each source states basically the same information.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why would a historian wish to consult multiple sources of information on a topic?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What would a political scientist wish to consult multiple sources of information on a topic?

A political scientist would consult multiple sources to ensure the accuracy and reliability of information, to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the topic from different perspectives, and to identify any biases or misinformation present in individual sources.


Biographers consult multiple sources before writing because?

Biographers consult multiple sources before writing to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the information presented about the subject. This helps in cross-referencing information, verifying facts, and presenting a well-rounded and objective portrayal of the individual's life.


Why would a political wish to consult multiple sources of information on a topic?

to corroborate a given primary source's claim about an event


You are extracting information from multiple sources. What information will appear on the derived from line?

multiple sources


How do historian's synthesize evidence to draw conclusions?

They determine how multiple sources differ.


Which best explains how a historian synthesizes evidence to reach a conclusion?

The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources.


Which best explains how a historian synthesized evidence to reach a conclusion?

The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources.


Which best explains how a historian synthesize evidence to reach a conclusion?

The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources.


What are the non-christian sources of written information about Jesus?

The Jewish historian Josephus is one of the major sources of factual, historical information about Jesus.


What does a historian study?

A historian studies events that happened in the past. The historian has the opportunity to study ancient history and modern history. They use various sources of information to make conclusions about events in world history.


What information will appear on the derived from line?

multiple sources


Why would a political scientist wish to consult multiple sources of information on a topic?

to corroborate a given primary source's claim about an event