The more sources there are to corroborate a conclusion, the more likely that conclusion is to be true.
-Apex
To corroborate a primary source's claim about an event n…
To corroborate a primary source's claim about an event
apex
To be sure the information is reliable. You need to look for a pattern and if each source states basically the same information.
multiple sources
The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources.
Synthesizing multiple sources of information by cross checking each information gathered to find similarities and them from that information form a cohesive argument. This may not be the best answer but at least you'll have one!
other sources of information from online services
What are three examples of primary sources a hitorisn might use
A political scientist would consult multiple sources to ensure the accuracy and reliability of information, to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the topic from different perspectives, and to identify any biases or misinformation present in individual sources.
Biographers consult multiple sources before writing to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the information presented about the subject. This helps in cross-referencing information, verifying facts, and presenting a well-rounded and objective portrayal of the individual's life.
to corroborate a given primary source's claim about an event
multiple sources
They determine how multiple sources differ.
The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources.
The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources.
The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources.
The Jewish historian Josephus is one of the major sources of factual, historical information about Jesus.
A historian studies events that happened in the past. The historian has the opportunity to study ancient history and modern history. They use various sources of information to make conclusions about events in world history.
multiple sources
to corroborate a given primary source's claim about an event