answersLogoWhite

0

To corroborate a primary source's claim about an event

apex

User Avatar

B

Lvl 3
3y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What would a political scientist wish to consult multiple sources of information on a topic?

A political scientist would consult multiple sources to ensure the accuracy and reliability of information, to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the topic from different perspectives, and to identify any biases or misinformation present in individual sources.


Biographers consult multiple sources before writing because?

Biographers consult multiple sources before writing to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the information presented about the subject. This helps in cross-referencing information, verifying facts, and presenting a well-rounded and objective portrayal of the individual's life.


How do historian's synthesize evidence to draw conclusions?

They determine how multiple sources differ.


You are extracting information from multiple sources. What information will appear on the derived from line?

multiple sources


Which best explains how a historian synthesized evidence to reach a conclusion?

The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources.


Which best explains how a historian synthesizes evidence to reach a conclusion?

The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources.


Why would a political wish to consult multiple sources of information on a topic?

to corroborate a given primary source's claim about an event


What are the non-christian sources of written information about Jesus?

The Jewish historian Josephus is one of the major sources of factual, historical information about Jesus.


What does a historian study?

A historian studies events that happened in the past. The historian has the opportunity to study ancient history and modern history. They use various sources of information to make conclusions about events in world history.


What makes a source useful for a historian?

A source is useful for a historian if it is contemporary to the events being studied, is reliable and trustworthy, and provides valuable insights or information that can help in understanding the historical context. Additionally, sources that offer multiple perspectives or viewpoints are often considered valuable for historians.


What is the correct name for a historian's 'clues'?

The correct name for a historian's 'clue' is sources.


What information will appear on the derived from line?

multiple sources