The Smiths in this case would simply be the plural of Smith. So there would be NO apostrophe.
Plural, meaning both persons as a married couple:
Please meet the Smiths.
The Smiths were away when their house was robbed.
Plural Singular
The robber took the Smith's television.
The Smith's home owners policy covered the theft.
IF you had a large meeting for all families named Smith, the simple plural would also be Smiths. However, for plural possessive, you'd first have Smiths with an apostrophe added, like this:
All the Smiths from Washington, DC attended a city-wide picnic. While there, all the Smiths' (s apostrophe) cars were vandalized. The picnic's promoters, the Browns, were doubly embarrassed; none of the Browns' (s apostrophe) cars were damaged.
If you have more than one person of a surname, just add 's'-- unless the name ends in s. (Smiths) If you have more than one person of a surname, so you add s, to make it possessive, add apostrophe after the plural s. (Smiths' coats... Smiths' cars... Smiths' cellphones...)
You would sign it without an apostrophe, because a plural does not usually need an apostrophe. So it would be: Love, the Smiths.
There are three types of apostrophe. The possessive apostrophe, to show that a letter is missing and to highlight a word or phrase, eg 'hasn't', doesn't', 'can't'. The possessive apostrophe would be used in a sentence such as 'The student's work was of a high standard' meaning the work of the student. However if you are using the word students in the plural form, it would be written 'students' work'.
would you pass me the sugar please
there is no apostrophe
We would. Apostrophe=woul[d]
Yes, you would add an apostrophe before the "s" to show possession. For example, "Smith's car" indicates that the car belongs to Smith.
You would sign it without an apostrophe, because a plural does not usually need an apostrophe. So it would be: Love, the Smiths.
Yes. 'Its' in that sentence is short for 'it is' so it should have an apostrophe.
There is no apostrophe in that sentence. It would be in: The scouts' tents.
There are three types of apostrophe. The possessive apostrophe, to show that a letter is missing and to highlight a word or phrase, eg 'hasn't', doesn't', 'can't'. The possessive apostrophe would be used in a sentence such as 'The student's work was of a high standard' meaning the work of the student. However if you are using the word students in the plural form, it would be written 'students' work'.
You don't need an apostrophe in that sentence. Studentsis a plural word, not a possessive.
With apostrophe (note spelling) is totally incorrect. "Smiths" is a plural and therefore does not take apostrophe, which denotes possessive case. Many people these days seem to think that apostrophes are required everywhere, but in reality they denote either possessives (the Smiths' dog, the blacksmith's dog) or a contraction such as "where's the dog" (where is the dog). A common mistake even amongst journalists and professional writers is to confuse "its" and "it's". The former is the possessive, the latter a contraction of "it is" as in "every dogs has its day" and "it's a dog of a day".
The apostrophe is not needed because deer is a singular and plural word. The sentence should read 'These deer antlers all have eight points.'
The apostrophe should go before the "s" in "Drs" to show that it is a contraction for "doctor's." The correct sentence is: "That was the Dr.'s order."
To form the plural possessive form for names, add an apostrophe and an "s" after the plural form of the name. For example, if the name is "Smith" and it is pluralized as "Smiths," the plural possessive form would be "Smiths'.
Bushfires shouldn't have an apostrophe.
For the sentence provided, you would not need an apostrophe because possession is being shown with the possessive pronoun "their."