It completely depends on how you define better. Aston would be better for style, reliability and comfort but the Lamborghini would beat it more often than not on the track.
depends what Aston Martin and what Lamborghini
You can't compare which car is "better" but the gallardo is faster than the vanquish
Aston martin always has been better lotus cant touch Aston martin
It depends on what you want to use it for. Aston is better for cruising around but for performance I would go for the Porsche.
It's all a matter of opinion but I think Aston Martin sport is the best because they(imo) better looking than Ferraris. V12 Vantage all the way!!
Yes. :D
Aston's really are not comparable to Ferrari. Astons are grand tourers, whereas most Ferrari models are sports cars. As such, the Astons are heavier, more comfortable, and possible nicer to drive - but ultimately slower.
LAMBORGHINI is way better than the saleen s7!
enzo ferrari is much better than a lamborghini
Aston is much better than MARVIN [but Marvin is ok] but astons better than all of den
It depends what kind of person you are. If you are more of a supercar and high-speed guy, you might want to get an Aston Martin for it's V-12 engines and racecar properties. If you're more into luxury than sports, i'd suggest the Maserati. Aston Martins are luxurious, but not as much as a Maserati. I, personally prefer Aston martins (Bristish car brand) than Maseratis (Italian marque). If you want v-12, get Aston martin, if you want to stick with ONLY v-8s, get a maserati.
Now it is the one-77 It cost about $2,700,000 it is faster and smaller than the Lamborghini aventador but costs more money but I still love the aventador because I is fierce and looks like a jet (jet fighter)