They are not dangerous by themselves. To be dangerous to anyone, a person has to be invloved.
Weapons are dangerous because the possession of one allows a person an increased ability to harm others or oneself. In essence however, weapons in and of themselves are not dangerous, the operator is.
That person may be described as dependent, requiring assistance or support from others for daily tasks and activities.
The author would most likely describe a person who texts and drives as irresponsible, dangerous, and putting themselves and others at risk.
A treacherous person is someone who is dangerous and will betray others.
An aggressive driver is a person who drives
Its a person who puts themselves above others not by merit but by their own assumptions... i think!
If they have not been committed by an emergency commitment order, or by court order, or by court sentence, and they do not exhibit any behavior that is dangerous to themselves or others, they cannot be held against their will.
A person who sacrifices themselves for others is often referred to as selfless or altruistic.
It can be dangerous to live with a schizophrenic person if they do not take medication and get treatment. Some people with schizophrenia are violent while others are more docile.
They work with others. In the FBI the case assigned they usually go with a squad of men. Depending on how dangerous the case is will determine the amount of agents. For example if the case is to arrest a violent drug dealear, then there would be alot of officers about 15
A person can be committed to a mental health institution ". If the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the respondent is dangerous to self or others or is gravely disabled, as a result of substance abuse or mental illness, it shall render a judgment for his commitment." So essentially if the person is a potential danger to themselves or others they can be involuntarily committed.