Yes. The conditional phrase "should have been seen" contains a string of auxilary verbs.
Yes, a sentence can have multiple subjects and verbs. This type of sentence is called a compound sentence. Each subject and verb pair will have its own clause, but they are connected to form a single sentence.
Helping verbs or auxiliary verbs combine with other verbs to form verb phrases.The primary auxiliary verbs are: be / have / doThe modal auxiliary verbs are: will / can / may / shall / mustThey combine with main verbs to form the various tenses eg:present/past continuous: is walking / was walkingpast/present perfect: have seen / had seenpast/present perfect continuous: have been waiting / had been waitingfuture: will goModal auxiliarys show:obligation: must goability: can climbpossibility: can seepermission: can useprediction: will rainand other uses.
To form past tense for multiple verbs in a sentence, you should conjugate each verb separately. For regular verbs, add "-ed" to the base form of the verb. For irregular verbs, use the past tense form of each verb. Make sure each verb agrees in tense with the subject of the sentence.
Subject: each student Verbs: has brought Objects: his book, paper, pencil Prepositional phrase: to class
No, "had said" cannot be used next to each other in a sentence because "had" is a past perfect auxiliary verb while "said" is the main verb in the past tense. They cannot both serve as main verbs in the same sentence without a connecting word.
At each other.
essentially it breaks up a sentence whilst linking each separated segment of the sentence with each other:)
To go into each other way means that interfering with the affairs of each other.
To identify the parts of speech in a sentence, you can analyze the function of each word within the sentence. Common parts of speech include nouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs, pronouns, prepositions, conjunctions, and interjections. Understanding the role that each word plays in the sentence structure will help you determine its part of speech.
I walked to the mall. I jumped on the escalator. I ran in the store. Those are about as parallel as it gets because the subjects, verbs (past participles), and prepositional phrases are in the same place in each sentence. In addition, they are about the same length and they incorporate anaphora, a literary device in which one begins each sentence with the same word. A more cryptic instance of parallelism: "The night was dark and very few could see. Then a girl stepped quietly, but every creature had heard." It's much more subtle, but the subject is essentially in the same place and adverbs/auxiliary verbs and regular verbs are parallel to each other, as well as conjunctions. "Girl" is to "night" where as "and" is to "but" and "could" is to "had." "Was" is to "stepped." The only slight difference in the structure is the article "a" in the second sentence. Articles generally do not have a profound effect on parallelism.
Yes, it is possible for two prepositions to be next to each other in a sentence. This is known as a compound preposition. For example, in the sentence "She walked into the park with her friends," "into" and "with" are both prepositions that are next to each other.
Nouns can be used as subjects and objects. I suppose that some nouns can be used as verbs, but it would be awkward, and there is always a more appropriate choice of an actual verb in place of a noun forced into being a verb. Remember, nouns and verbs are parts of speech, subjects and objects are parts of a sentence along with predicates, phrases, clauses, modifiers. Nouns and verbs share the same category, as a way to differentiate them from each other. You are trying to mix the two different types of grammatical...categories? rules?