No.
A witness is a witness whether you know the person or not. You could be considered a conflit of interest.Added: I believe you might be looking for phrase: TAINTED witness.
Atticus asks Mr. Ewell to write his name to show the court his dominant hand, as he is trying to prove that Mr. Ewell could have been the one to harm his daughter, Mayella. This questioning helps to establish doubt about Mr. Ewell's credibility and the events surrounding the case.
This would depend on whether the witness was capable of making a valid identification. If the witness made statements that were inconsistent with the facts of the case, the witness could be impeached (found to be untruthful) at trial or not called as a witness at all, invalidating the lineup identification.
He was the dog. The kids learned that Atticus could shoot.
Atticus worried that White men would try to take justice into their own hands. He sat there to protect the prisoner, even if it meant Atticus could be in danger. White men did come, demanding that Atticus step aside.
Miss Maudie did not attend the trial because, as she tells Scout in "To Kill a Mockingbird," she could not bear to witness Atticus making "the best defense he can." She chooses to stay home and pray for Atticus's success instead.
to rule the world
Jehovah's Witnesses have no celebrities. Jehovah's Witnesses do not recognize anyone as celebrities. We consider no one as 'famous'.If non-witnesses consider someone who is one of Jehovah's Witnesses as a celebrity, we would have no knowledge of their views.Perhaps this is where a non-Witness can provide a list of those they consider a celebrity, that also happens to be a Witness. But we could not confirm whether they really are a Witness or not. We keep no such records.
Atticus wants Mr.Ewell to sign the envelope to see which hand was his best meaning that he could have possibly beat his daughter.
In which chapter does Atticus fail his children? If you could provide more context or information, I would be able to give a more accurate response.
yes they canAdded: Umm-m-m-m ... in most case, yes they can - but under certain circumstances using a relative as a witness could prove problematic - ESPECIALLY if the relative/witness is a beneficiary of whatever it is that they are witnessing. In such case it would probably be best to get an independent witness to your signature.
Yes, it was a difficult decision for Atticus to make because he had to choose between upholding his principles and facing potential backlash from his community. Atticus understood the moral gravity of his decision and the impact it could have on his family and his reputation as a lawyer.