It's likely that either friend would have acted differently if they had been captured alongside the other. The fear of shared vulnerability could lead to more cautious behavior or a stronger drive to cooperate for mutual survival. Additionally, their bond might motivate them to strategize together, influencing their decisions under pressure. Ultimately, the presence of a companion could alter their responses to the situation significantly.
i would have done my chores he just would not give it back Those are correct answers above, except that the real problem people have is in conditional sentence constructions like this: "If I would have known the truth, I would have acted differently." That is incorrect. The following two options are correct: "If I had known the truth, I would have acted differently" or "Had I known the truth, I would have acted differently."
Make sure you apologize to the friend that you wronged. Explain why you acted like that and tell them that you acted without thinking. Then ask them what they were feeling to make them argue with you that way.
Mithra kurian
He was ostracized because he always dressed and acted differently than everyone else.
I asked the same exact question and the answer is no... You would be a bad friend if you acted on this...
The entire revolution could have been avoided had the colonists and British acted differently. However, on the course the two sides had set, a confrontation in Boston was inevitable.
She was perfect and still a woman to be admired and to learn from today.
She was perfect and still a woman to be admired and to learn from today.
Either balanced or unbalanced force!
Hanna doesn't actually know that Mona is A. Mona pretended to be her friend and acted how she always does.
Buchanan could have prevented war by not allowing the Confederate to separate from the Union. Buchanan could have also acted differently on issues of slavery, especially in Kansas.
In the Middle Ages, royalty had access to aspects of the Church to which the peasants did not have. For example, many monarchs had a priest who acted as the monarch's personal confessor.