Has the state constitution of California been amended to prohibit same-sex marriage in that state?

Answer 1

Yes, in November 2006. The amendment says:

A marriage between a man and a woman is the only domestic legal union that shall be valid or recognized in this state.

This amendment was struck down as unconstitutional by the Federal District Court on May 13, 2014.

Answer 2

Yes, in June 2006, but that amendment has since been struck down as unconstitutional. The amendment used to say:

(a) This amendment shall be known and may be cited as the Sanctity of Marriage Amendment.(b) Marriage is inherently a unique relationship between a man and a woman. As a matter of public policy, this state has a special interest in encouraging, supporting, and protecting this unique relationship in order to promote, among other goals, the stability and welfare of society and its children. A marriage contracted between individuals of the same sex is invalid in this state.(c) Marriage is a sacred covenant, solemnized between a man and a woman, which, when the legal capacity and consent of both parties is present, establishes their relationship as husband and wife, and which is recognized by the state as a civil contract.(d) No marriage license shall be issued in the State of Alabama to parties of the same sex.(e) The State of Alabama shall not recognize as valid any marriage of parties of the same sex that occurred or was alleged to have occurred as a result of the law of any jurisdiction regardless of whether a marriage license was issued.(f) The State of Alabama shall not recognize as valid any common law marriage of parties of the same sex.(g) A union replicating marriage of or between persons of the same sex in the State of Alabama or in any other jurisdiction shall be considered and treated in all respects as having no legal force or effect in this state and shall not be recognized by this state as a marriage or other union replicating marriage.

Answer 3

Yes, in November 2008. The amendment said: "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California."

The amendment has been ruled unconstitutional by several courts. It is currently under review by the United States Supreme Court, which is expected to issue a final decision on the matter by June 30, 2013.

Answer 4

Yes, in November 2006, but the amendment was struck down by the US Supreme Court on June 26, 2015. The amendment used to say:
The historical institution and legal contract solemnizing the relationship of one man and one woman shall be the only legally recognized marital contract in this state. Any policy or law or judicial interpretation, purporting to define marriage as anything other than the historical institution and legal contract between one man and one woman is contrary to the public policy of this state and shall be void and unenforceable in Tennessee. If another state or foreign jurisdiction issues a license for persons to marry and if such marriage is prohibited in this state by the provisions of this section, then the marriage shall be void and unenforceable in this state.

Answer 5

No. No such amendment has been made. In November 2008, residents of Arizona voted to reject a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.