WE can not answer your question because you have not told us which country the immigrants were coming to - what is the adopted country!
Immigrants used public services but didn't pay taxes.
An argument can be made that school hours should not be changed because of sports practice and other after school activities.
special programs could become available to get individuals who commit crimes to become involved in meaningful activities in society, so this would prevent future criminal activities from occurring.
my understanding is some people do not consider it right to call someone an illegal alien/immigrant because it classifies them as a criminal, and they believe that saying undocumented immigrant is a better term because no one should be called a criminal because they entered the country without papers in order to make a better life for their family.
A counter argument is an argument made against another argument.
The word you are probably looking for is a fallacy. However, a fallacy is generally considered to be an argument which has a superficial attractiveness, but which on closer examination proves to have no logical basis. A good example is the argument "We all know that if a person is an immigrant they will work for cheap. He works for cheap so he has to be an immigrant." This particular fallacy is called affirming the consequent. Or the argument, "My Holy Book is the true word of God because the true word of God, contained in my Holy Book, says so. And you know you can believe it because it is the word of God." This fallacy is called a circular argument, begging the question (a phrase which is often used by people who have no idea what it means), or in Latin, petitio principii. However, an "argument" which is just nonsense, like, "My father was a true-blue American and I hate Chinese food so the US should declare war on North Korea", basically lacks even superficial attractiveness and would only appeal to those who cannot reason from A to A, and is not usually called a fallacy.
If we are talking about a modern country it is possible but difficult. Even not being an illegal immigrant it can be difficult to get legal dependency status. The reason being is that the country that you are trying to will try to prove that you are not marrying for the reason of getting citizenship. You will have to make an convincing argument. Also you cannot have a criminal record, so if you are caught being an illegal immigrant than you have just about screwed up your chances. It is harder to leave places such as the United States, Australia, England etc than it is to get in (without a legal visa)
One example of a line of reasoning supporting the argument that climate change is primarily caused by human activities is the correlation between the increase in greenhouse gas emissions from human activities, such as burning fossil fuels and deforestation, and the rise in global temperatures. Scientists have observed a direct link between the release of these gases into the atmosphere and the warming of the planet, leading to the conclusion that human actions are the main driver of climate change.
Passing an argument by value means that the method that receives the argument can not change the value of the argument. Passing an argument by reference means that the method that receives the argument can change the value of the incoming argument, and the argument may be changed in the orignal calling method.
The main argument of this essay is that climate change is primarily caused by human activities, specifically the burning of fossil fuels, deforestation, and industrial processes. The essay emphasizes the urgent need for global action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate the impacts of climate change.
Argument Deductive argument Inductive Argument Analogy
argument