What are the differences in non-abusive arguments and abusive arguments?

Answer 1

easyA non-abusive fight is yelling..maybe you hit the wall or something to get out your aggression. An abusive fight is when instead of hitting the wall, the person hits YOU. Even if it is something that is not quite a big deal, like grabbing your shoulders, i would still think of it as abusive. Also, if the person is doing most of the yelling and is telling you that you that its all your fault and that you are the probelm, i would think it was an abusive fight. AnswerNon-abusive arguments are the ones where you get to the point of the argument and get to a compromise or solution you both can agree on. We are all entitled to our own opinions but there is a middle ground in most arguments. There may be some raising of the voices but no violence or breaking of things or immature actions, like taking it out on a pet or kids, no name calling or deragatory remarks, and definitely no past arguments should be brought up or personal jabs at a persons past or lifestyle. You stick to the issue at hand and resolve it to the best of the parties ability to move on. Now this could take a day or a week depending on the subject of argument or the maturity level of the people involved. Its usually best for everyones stress level to resolve the matter quickly but fairly. Dragging out issues can beset resentment andhostility which are two other issues not needed in a relationship. Abusive arguments are hurtfuland mean, violent, distructive and do not benefit anyone, if you think your in an abusive relationship, go to your local phonebook and there is a abuse hot-line you can call, these people will ask you pertinent questions to help you. Good luck.

Answer 2

Non-abusive arguments involve respectful communication, where people express their opinions, provide evidence, and engage in rational discussion. These arguments focus on the issue at hand, rather than attacking the person. Abusive arguments, on the other hand, involve insults, belittling, and personal attacks. They aim to hurt the individual rather than addressing the topic, often leading to a breakdown of understanding and resolution.