0
Why is improving personal relationships a poorly phrased specific purpose for a speech?
"Improving personal relationships" is a poorly phrased specific purpose for a speech because it is vague and lacks clarity on the intended outcome. It does not specify which relationships are being addressed or the methods for improvement, making it difficult for the audience to grasp the focus of the speech. A more effective specific purpose would clearly define the type of relationships and outline actionable steps for enhancement. This focus would help engage the audience and provide them with clear takeaways.
What else can I help you with?
What do you do when you love a girl she says she also loves you But she lives fourteen hours away and likes somebody else?
move on...based on the way your question is phrased you sound young, long distance relationships are not worth it.
How do you phrase a question to get the answer you seek?
So far you seem to be doing well. Your question needs to be phrased as a question, be grammatically coherent, and be directed to the specific issue you wish an answer on.
Who are the five augustinian?
The question, as phrased, makes no sense
What is the answer for 3d squares?
What is the question? This question, as phrased, is meaningless.
When a question is phrased as a request what should end with?
A question that is phrased as a request should end with a question mark. This punctuation indicates that the sentence is seeking information or confirmation from the listener.
A form for a foreign applicant?
I recommend a better phrased question.
How do you change a water pump in a force?
that is an awfully phrased question
Is it true that it is NOT slander ot libel if it is phrased as a question?
Not necessarily.
Do writing make you smarter?
No offence but i can see why you are asking this question. The question should be phrased "Does writing make you smarter" and in response to this i would suggest Yes, although reading is also very important in giving you intellectual phrases to use improving people's perception of your mind, making you smarter.
Should people be allowed to defend themselves by killing?
Your question is not well phrased. The law allows someone to kill to defend themselves, they nevertheless still have to prove such a circumstance. Should a person be allowed to kill in self-defense? That is a personal choice.
Sentence with the word remarkable?
The way in which that question was phrased was truly remarkable
What is the correct phrase 'which all had' or 'all of which had'?
It actually would be phrased as "who all had."
