Child support is intended to help pay for the basic living expenses, such as rent, utilities, clothing, insurance and the like, all of which remain the same even when the child is visiting the non-custodial parent.
The obligation should not end, but rather transferred to the now nun-custodial parent.
No. The court should be notified of the marriage so the child support order can be terminated.No. The court should be notified of the marriage so the child support order can be terminated.No. The court should be notified of the marriage so the child support order can be terminated.No. The court should be notified of the marriage so the child support order can be terminated.
It depends on the state. If your state calculates child support based on household income, then yes, she would be required to pay her husband's child support. If your state calculates child support based on only the non-custodial parent's income, then no, should would not be required to pay. However, her husband would still owe that money, and it will continue to accumulate as a debt until he pays it.
You should talk to a lawyer.However, I don't think the law specifically says 50% of daycare. However, the law does require the noncustodial parent to contribute to the support of the child, so financial arrangements can be imposed on the noncustodial parent to meet the child's needs within the parents' means. (Thus, the noncustodial parent might well have to pay for 100% of such things.) And this may well mean that the noncustodial parent has to provide enough funding for daycare if needed. Still, it is essential to talk to a lawyer and come up with a formal support arrangement between the two parents to avoid legal disputes in the future.http://www.child-support-laws-state-by-state.com/washington-state-child-support.html
It really depends on how the parental rights are divided and should be specified in your divorce/support paperwork.
The noncustodial parent is only responsible for any child support payment. It is the responsibility of the custodial parent to organise the child's life, including any necessary insurance cover. Basically, you didn't want them having any say in the child's life, so you cannot expect them to simply do everything for nothing.
if the NCP has some source of income, such as unemployment (but not SSI or public assistance), or substantial assets ANSWER But you should negotiate a reduction and file it with the courts
The custodial parent should file for a modification of that order as soon as possible. Also, she should file a motion for contempt at the same time and get an action going for child support arrears.
If an underage permit driver had an accident in a noncustodial parent's car, the insurance of the custodial parent should cover the cost. Contact the insurance company for full coverage benefits.
No, but the new CP should immediately return to the venue that issued the order to get it terminated, or at least suspended until custody is worked out.Wrong. The newly-custodial parent will have to continue to pay child support until which time the "current" court order reflects that you no longer have to.Such things as a large pay differences could very-well continue having you pay child support but at a very small amount, in order to equalize the child's living conditions.(I thought it was BS too but I'm a single father who still pays child support)
Should not affect it, and besides, it's for the kids benefit.
Yes. If the absent parent is committed to creating a relationship with their child that parent should petition the court for a child visitation schedule. A child should have the benefit of two parents. However, the absent parent should allow the child to acclimate slowly by visiting the child in her own environment at first until a trusting and comfortable relationship can develop. Also, the absent parent shouldn't make those changes unless they are committed to form a permanent relationship. It would be extremely damaging to the child if that parent disappeared from their life again.