There are multiple reasons why adopted children should not be allowed to contact their biological parents, however this is dependent on the reasons why the children was put into foster/adoptive care.
For example, some children are removed from their biological parent's care due to a matter of them not being able to care for the child, they may have broken the law are not fit to have the child. Considering this, the child, at the age of 18 are allowed to look into their biological parents if they wish. This is because they will no longer need permission. Many children choose not to do this as they settle with the adoptive families and feel no reason to contact their biological parents.
Some children are placed for adoption as their parents feel it is the better option for the well being of the child. However, in these case the parents often opt for an open adoption which is designed so that the biological parents are still allowed relatively regular contact with their child.
In this case, i believe it is fully acceptable for the child to have contact with the parent
As long as the biological parent did no wrong by the child, i believe they should be able to contact their parents
Illegitimate children as opposed to adopted children, should be able to determine who their parents are.
Depends. Some children who have contact with both they're biological and adoptive parents refer to both sets as "mom & dad". So I would talk to both sets and ask what they feel comfortable as to what you should call you're biological parents.
Yes it is a basic human right, but is is also the right of the parent to refuse contact. It is also important that the child is mature enough for this contact if the circumstances of separation have been difficult.
The biological parents should be on the engagement announcement whether they are divorced or have remarried.
parents should DEFINENTLY correct their children or the kids might think it is fine and do it again
because some childrens parentsare bad people so some children dont want to know?^^^^^^^^^^^^First of all, what do you know about adoptions and biological families. Who are you to say that a parent is bad? Or decide that just because a child is adopted they should be labeled as bad parents. That is an immature and very cruel answer.A child LOSES EVERYTHING when ripped from their family. I was taken away and adopted by jerks. Had I contacted my mom she would have reported them and an investigation would have opened up against them. But I wasnt allowed to contact my family. Everyone said I was being dramatic. That I was crazy. Honey I am 17 years old now and I know I wasnt crazy. 10 years later I learn that all along it was them. Adopted children should have their own rights when it comes to contacting their family.
No parents should stop telling there children waht to do after there 16 because the adults after 16. yes parents should stop telling there children waht to do after there 16 because the adults after 16.
Since this is the adoption category I assume you mean not the biological grandchildren but foster kids who have never been adopted. And no, they have no right at all to anything their foster family leaves behind unless they are mentioned in the will. If you mean biological children they inherit their parents who in their turn inherit their parents, your grandparents. So unless the grandchild is mentioned in the will or the parents are deceased, the grandchild will not inherit the grandparents.
Loving parents (this category includes grumpy, tired, in-need-of-a-break parents) do not pass on genital herpes to their children through the ‘normal’ intimacies of family life. But if it does happen that they get it, it has to be by way of sexual contact. This should be reported.
Children should be taught by parents how to behave.
yes
no