It was often necessary for entire families to work due to economic hardships and the need for multiple incomes to meet basic living expenses. In many historical contexts, such as during the Industrial Revolution, low wages and high costs of living compelled families to pool their labor to survive. Additionally, children's contributions were essential in agricultural and industrial settings, where every member's effort was needed to sustain the household. This collective labor model was a response to societal and economic pressures that demanded all hands on deck.
plymouth
Plymouth
Well bascially, the system would hire entire families to work which let labor fill up quickly. It also hired most children to work entire hours but would pay them less so the owners would make more profit. Also, workers would get homes provided. One last thing, the practice of paying workers with credit started.
No. That is for more private moments and not when your entire families are watching.
Yes. At times he killed entire families.
People lived in poverty and couldn’t afford rent and food. Entire families had to work to make enough money to pay for rent and food.
Poor families needed work in the Antebellum period (pre Civil War). Slater's unique methos of running his mills (The Rhode Island Method) allowed entire families to move to one of Slater's mill's without seperating. Families could live in company owned housing and earn wages.
It was necessary.
family readiness
they try to wipe out entire races, religions or families
Because families are there to help each other when there are problems.
Hitler killed entire towns, including whole families. No one was safe from the nazis, remember over 6 million died.