yes
Some do and some don't. The risk is probably bigger if the child was older and against the adoption.
I believe with the breakup of the Manson family some of those children where taken by the Child Protective Services. Now as to which ones, if any, were Mansons it's hard to say. But some were placed in foster homes and a few were adopted out. So it is very possible that Manson's offspring were placed into homes for adoption.
Kittens can typically be adopted out to their new homes when they are around 8 to 12 weeks old.
There's no simple answer to that. For the adopted children, homes are just about always better than orphanages. And women still do get injured through pregnancy or birth. If you well and truly knew that would happen to you, then adoption would be better. And sometimes there are hereditary diseases and conditions which a responsible adult would prefer not to pass on to their children, again making adoption a sensible option. OTOH, many adopted kids go through a tough period in their (late) teens, struggling with their identity, why they were adopted, what life would have been it they'd stayed with their "real" parents, and things like that.
He's against it, even though there are thousands of children with no parents. He prefers that children stay in state care even if they are in institutions (not foster homes) rather than be adopted by same sex couples.
Pearl Buck's parents were missionaries in China when she was a child. Her family had to flee to Shanghai during the Boxer Rebellion.
Oklahoma Baptist Homes for Children was created in 1903.
As of 2012, the Dave Thomas Foundation for Adoption reported that over 4,000 children had been adopted through its initiatives. The foundation focuses on increasing the number of adoptions from foster care and raising awareness about the needs of waiting children. Its efforts aim to find permanent homes for children who might otherwise remain in the foster care system.
Each year, approximately 125,000 children in the United States are waiting to be adopted from foster care. This number represents the average number of unadopted children each year who are in need of permanent homes and families.
Children would leave their homes and would be evacuated to somewhere safe like the countryside. Some of the mothers would be evacuated as well, some of them would even go to war to fight, but most of them stayed at their homes in the city, possibly facing their death. Children would go with their schools to the train stations and families from the countryside or any other safe area would come and choose the children they would like to come with them. The children would have to be well behaved and clean to get chosen.
an important one. without the women, their would be no reasons for the soldiers to return to their homes, and there would be no children to raise.
Jake Terpstra has written: 'Group homes for children' -- subject(s): Group homes for children, Children, Institutional care