0
Yes, Mme Loisel and her husband are credible characters because they are portrayed realistically with flaws, desires, and motivations that make them relatable to readers. Despite their flaws, they act in a believable manner consistent with their personalities throughout the story.
What else can I help you with?
In the end mme loisel felt that with greater riches would be able to draw the eyes of her husband upon herself?
in the end mme loisel felt that with greater riches would be able to draw the eyes of her husband upon herself
Do you think Mme Loisel recognized good quality jewelry?
Yes Mme Loisel recognized good quality jewelry
Who are the characters in 'The Necklace'?
Mr. and Mrs. Loisel, Mme Forestier ( owner of the necklace, who loans it out for Mme Loisel"s one night stand) miscellanous walk-on characters, people at the party, cab driver, etc. at no time did she have the common sense of calling up her friend and simply recounting everything that happened- which would have avoided much ( toil and trouble, not to mention money loss) The basic premise of a lost article figures in such social commentary tales as The Overcoat ( all of the money was Confederate), and watered down or turnabout plots, such as the (Super Car) a Detroit Dream car that figured in a plot in Bewitched and thanks to some Magic, was resolved happily- the car was returned to the Detroit custom shop where it was made, and the advertising executive ( who was driving the car when transmuted back to Detroit- seized on the idea of using it as an advertising prop ( he was selling sausages) it came out well, unlike the Necklace tale. listen folks- Observe and Heed article Nine from the Guy Upstairs....
HOW WAS the ball to Mme loisel and m.loisel?
Yes
How did Mme Forestier recognize Mme Loisel when they met in the Champ-Elysees?
In Guy de Maupassant's short story, "The Necklace" (1884), it is Mme. Loisel, the one who borrowed and lost the necklace, who recognizes Mme. Forestier. This meeting sets up the twist ending.
Who is the owner of the necklace in the necklace?
MMe Forestier. It is a counterfeit wearing copy. She smugly does not inform social-climbing Mme Loisel ( la-zell it was pronounced when I had this in English) that it is a wearing copy. she loses it at the ball- exactly how is not stated- a phone call could have saved about sixty grand and a nose-dive into debt slavery and relative poverty.
Why had M Loisel been saving 400 Francs?
they have been saving 400 francs for Mme loisel dress to the ball.
What do the loisel actions after the necklaces is lost reveal about their individual characters?
Mme. Loisel's actions reveal her materialistic and superficial nature as she becomes obsessed with appearances and social status. Mr. Loisel's actions, on the other hand, show his humility and willingness to sacrifice for his wife's happiness, despite his own financial limitations.
O you think Mme Loisel recognized good quality jewelry?
yes
How did Mme Forestier recognize Mme Loisel when they met in the Champs-Elysees?
She wants her to see what despair and trouble that necklace had cost her and want her to feel guilty but in the end she get a suprise #Sabrina
Describe Mme loisel's reaction on reading the invitation?
Mme Loisel is initially disappointed upon reading the invitation because she had hoped for a more glamorous event. However, she later becomes excited as she sees it as an opportunity to dress up and be in high society.
Why was Mme Loisel anxious to hurry awayfrom the ball?
In a hurry because she had lost her necklace and did not know where it was.
