answersLogoWhite

0

Apparently not.

A person puporting to be Douglas Adams posted this on a newsgroup in 1993:

"The answer to this is very simple. It was a joke. It had to be a number, an

ordinary, smallish number, and I chose that one. Binary representations,

base thirteen, Tibetan monks are all complete nonsense. I sat at my desk,

stared into the garden and thought '42 will do' I typed it out. End of story"

That this person actually is Adams appears to be credible. (See related link below for source)

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?