He sees the monster's eyes fill with evil as he watches Frankenstein create the female.
APEX
Victor Frankenstein didn't want to create a female creature because he thought that they will have kids and bring evil to earth.
He fears the monster will kill Elizabeth and his father
The cards text clearly says: "When this card is removedfrom the field, destroy the monster." If for any reason Call of the Haunted is removed from the field, even to your hand, the monster it brought back will be destroyed.
In the movie- and this shocked audiences, Frankenstein"s monster attacked and accidentally killed a child by tossing her into a lake in what looked like a park. Naturally, this stirred up the townspeople that a MONSTER was on the loose. Child abuse is a real monster topic and it is intriguing it was worked into the Colin Clive- James Whale Frankenstein film- the critics did not like the child murder sequence- perhaps he could have accidentally dunked her but she survived- or similar (Pink heart) surgery to soften the blows. In the book, his first real victim was William, Victor's younger brother. He had wandered off in the woods, and he insulted the monster for his ugliness. The monster gets angry and strangles him.
This answer is from Wikipedia. It's a very good answer & reason why Frankenstein's monster was never really named : Frankenstein's monster (or Frankenstein's creature) is a fictional character that first appeared in Mary Shelley's novel, Frankenstein, or The Modern Prometheus. In the novel, the creature has no name—a symbol of his parentlessness and lack of human sense of self and identity. He does call himself, when speaking to his creator, Victor Frankenstein, the "Adam of your labours". He is also variously referred to as a "creature," "fiend," "the dæmon," "wretch," "zombie," "devil," "being," and "ogre" in the novel.[1] The monster's namelessness became part of the stage tradition as Mary Shelley's story was adapted into serious and comic plays in London, Paris, and France during the decades after the novel's first appearance. Mary Shelley herself attended a performance of Presumption, the first successful stage adaptation of her novel. "The play bill amused me extremely, for in the list of dramatic personae came, _______ by Mr T. Cooke,” she wrote her friend Leigh Hunt. “This nameless mode of naming the unnameable is rather good.”[2] Into this vacuum, it is understandable that the name of the creator—Frankenstein—would soon be used to name the creation. That mistake was made within the first decade after the novel was published, but it became cast in concrete after the story was popularized in the famous 1930s Universal film series starring Boris Karloff. The film was based largely on a play by Peggy Webling, performed in London in 1927.[3] Curiously, Webling's Frankenstein actually does give his creature his name. The Universal film reverted to the empty cypher, however: the film's credits list the character Karloff plays as a series of question marks. Nevertheless, the creature soon enough became best known in the popular imagination as "Frankenstein".
Tourism.
he defied the laws of divine being.
No, it is not right to destroy nature. Why? One example of a reason not to destroy nature is that if we didn't have any trees, we wouldn't be able to breathe! In conclusion, it's not right to destroy nature.
You Shouldn't! There is no reason to destroy endangered tree species. You shouldn't destroy endangered tree species.
There does not appear to be a ruling on Chaos Burst, however, Guard Minesis very similar to this card. The effect of this Normal Trap reads, "Activate only when a card is activated with an effect that would target and destroy 1 monster you control. Negate the effect and destroy that card. Then inflict 500 damage to your opponent." An official ruling for this card stated the following: You can Chain Guard Mines to a card that will resolve in the Graveyard, like Exiled Force. If you do, the effect of the card will be negated, but since it cannot be destroyed no damage will be inflicted.Since Chaos Bursthas wording and an effect that's very close to Guard Mines, it looks like no damage will be inflicted to your opponent if Chaos Burstfails to destroy a monster for whatever reason. Also to note is that you will still have to tribute a monster to activate the effect of Chaos Bursteven if it fails to destroy a monster.
Victor Frankenstein creates the monster for the sake of pure glory, for immortality, both in name and literally. He had become consumed by his quest for greatness, a mission to have his name passed through generations as the man who had created life. He also creates the monster for the idea of being able to bestow life upon himself. Should he be successful in learning how life worked, he would be able to apply his studies to himself and live for eternity. Truly, his motives were selfish, and as he created the monster, he thought nothing of what he would do with the monster after it was created, and bore absolutely no responsibility to it.
If an equipped monster finds itself no longer equipped to a monster for any reason, then it is sent to the graveyard.