Maupassant uses deliberate ambiguity in "The Necklace" by leaving the reader unsure of Mathilde's true motives and feelings, leading to tension and conflict. By keeping the value and authenticity of the necklace vague, he creates doubt and suspense around its significance. This ambiguity ultimately heightens the impact of the story's twist ending.
Because mathilde was being selfish and she borrowed the necklace from wealthy friends?!?
The internal conflict in "The Necklace" is Madame Loisel's dissatisfaction with her social status and desire for a lavish lifestyle. The external conflict arises when she loses the borrowed necklace and must replace it, plunging her and her husband into poverty and debt.
you shouldn't be asking on here im guessing its ur coursework? technically that's classed as cheating
The main conflict in "The Necklace" by Guy de Maupassant is both internal and external. The external conflict revolves around Mathilde Loisel's desire to appear wealthy and elegant, leading her to borrow a diamond necklace to wear to a party. The internal conflict arises when she loses the necklace and struggles with the consequences of her actions.
In "The Necklace" by Guy de Maupassant, the resolution occurs when Mathilde discovers that the necklace she borrowed was actually a fake and not a real diamond necklace she thought she lost. This revelation serves as the climax of the story, highlighting the theme of appearances versus reality and the consequences of vanity and greed. Ultimately, the conflict is resolved when Mathilde and her husband work hard for ten years to pay off the debt incurred to replace the necklace.
In the short story "The Necklace" by Guy de Maupassant, the rising action occurs when Mathilde borrows a necklace from her friend Madame Forestier to wear to a fancy party. After losing the necklace, Mathilde and her husband go into debt to replace it, leading to years of hardship and financial struggle. This rising action sets the stage for the conflict and resolution of the story.
the pek pek is masarap
the diamond necklace was loose. And Mathilde buy a new one that look like with the lost one, the new necklace are worth of 40 thousands francs. But the lost diamond necklace was a paste and worth 500 francs only. But it's too late to known. :(
Role Ambiguity - norms for a specific position are vague, unclear and ill-defined. Actors disagree on role expectations, not because there is role conflict but because role expectations are unclear. Examples: job descriptions, clinical objectives.
i think the conflict begin with Mrs Loisel who pretends to be part of the high society beyond their limits. it ends after 10 years of suffering to repay for the lost necklace which they thought it was diamond.
Student's misdemeanor Impoverished ambiguity Role-conflict Poor
\ i a fine and ok 'and i am vrery happy about it pls catch and win the prople who r crimenal