He contributed to the cost of the new necklace by giving 18 francs from his father.
The Loisel couple realizes that the necklace Mathilde borrowed is missing. They search frantically but cannot find it. Unable to locate the necklace, they decide to replace it with a similar one at a high cost. They work hard for years to repay the debt incurred from purchasing the new necklace.
We learn that Mathilde loves clothes and jewels more than anything.Invited to a party but with nothing to wear, Mathilde gets her husband to buy her a new dress and borrows a necklace from a friend.Mathilde loses the necklace.Mathilde and her husband buy a new necklace and work for years to get out of debt after doing so.Mathilde runs into the friend, who does not even recognize her.
She wants her to see what despair and trouble that necklace had cost her and want her to feel guilty but in the end she get a suprise #Sabrina
In "The Necklace," during the ten years it took Madame Loisel to work and pay for the necklace, she had matured. She came to understand what poverty really meant as well as hard work, since she now had to work to help her husband pay for the necklace. She changed both physically as well as mentally.
Mme. Loisel was forced to forfeit everything of their joy and ease in order to pay back the necklace's purchase price. She and her husband relocated and rented an attic inside a building. She let their servant go in an effort to save costs in any way she could. Without regard for her beauty or charm, Mathilde was forced to handle all the household duties by herself. Every day, she fetched water, washed the dirty clothes, and scrubbed the greasy dishes. She went to the market and haggled with several people to get the best deal possible.
The hyperbole in "The Necklace" by Guy de Maupassant occurs when Mathilde Loisel exaggerates the importance of her appearance and status. When she borrows a necklace to wear to a fancy party, she believes it will elevate her social standing to that of a wealthy woman, when in reality it leads to her downfall due to the deception and debt it causes.
According to the jeweler the necklace was worth 40,000 francs; but they could have it for 36,000 francs; he would buy it back for 34,000 - obviously it wasn't really worth the original 40,000 & he hadn't been able to sell it.
This story is told in 3rd person omniscient because you know the thoughts and feelings of madame Loisel and her husband Monsieur. You see Madame Loisel's thoughts in the beginning of the story when she is dreaming about what her life should be like as a rich woman when she is always telling herself she is poor even though she isn't. She is actually in high middle class but she wants all luxuries possible and says the only things she loves are clothes and jewels but she has none of them and is so self conscious and is constantly thinking that others are tormenting and insulting her poverty. You see Monsieur thoughts when he asks Madame Loisel how much she thinks a beautiful dress for the ball would cost and she replies 400 francs. The author describes how he turns pale because that was the exact amount of money that he was saving up for a gun he wanted but gives Madame Loisel the money anyways, which shows two people's point of veiw. Note: The Loisel's are not high middle class in the beginning of the story. They reach that level by the end of the story but at the beginning, they are higher low class.
The cost varies based on the type of necklace and the jeweler. Your best bet would be to take the necklace to the jeweler's and get a rate.
"The Necklace", a short story written by Guy de Maupassant, tells the stor about a middle-class woman, Madame Mathilde Loisel, who aspires to become a part of a higher social class. She is married to a low-paid clerk who works hard to make her happy, however, despite his efforts, she is still constantly unhappy and discontented. The necklace featured in the title is her friend's diamond necklace, which she borrowed so that she has something to use for a particular party. Madame Mathilde lost the borrowed necklace during the party, and, instead of admitting to her friend what has transpired, she sought to replace the piece with a similar necklace that costed her 36,000 francs. This purchase caused her extreme poverty. After 10 years, however, she saw Madame Forrestier, the person who owned the necklace that she borrowed. She explained what has happened in the past and how she lived terribly after she has replaced the lost one, only to find out that the piece that she borrowed was an imitation that costed only 500 francs. The necklace could be considered the symbolism of her extreme desire to "fit in" with the higher ranks of the society, as well as the cause of her misfortunes and eventual poverty.
$28.00
Depends on the size, length, and most importantly weight of the necklace