answersLogoWhite

0

Shaw has distinctly reversed gender role through the characters Louka , Catherine and Sergius. We can observe the masculinity in Louka's character while provoking Nicola. Again her firmness has been lightened through her interaction with Sergius. Mrs. Petkoff has also a touch of masculinity in her dominating part over household works in absence of Mr. Petkoff.On the other hand, Sergius lacks firmness before Bluntschli. He can stand up steadily neither before Raina, nor before Louka. There is a faint touch of effeminacy.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How does Shaw reverse gender roles in arms and the man?

Shaw has distinctly reversed gender role through the characters Louka , Catherine and Sergius. We can observe the masculinity in Louka's character while provoking Nicola. Again her firmness has been lightened through her interaction with Sergius. Mrs. Petkoff has also a touch of masculinity in her dominating part over household works in absence of Mr. Petkoff.On the other hand, Sergius lacks firmness before Bluntschli. He can stand up steadily neither before Raina, nor before Louka. There is a faint touch of effeminacy.


What are the strengths and weaknesses of George Bernard Shaw's Pygmalion?

Strengths of George Bernard Shaw's "Pygmalion" include its exploration of social class and gender roles, its wit and humor, and its memorable characters. Weaknesses may include some outdated views on gender and class, and the lack of a definitive resolution for some characters' arcs.


Who is the author of arms and the man?

George Bernard Shaw


Who wrote 'Arms and the Man'?

George Bernard Shaw


Who is the Arms and the Man playwright?

Could it be George Bernard Shaw?


Facets of love in bernard shaw's arms and the man thematic analysis?

what are the facets of love in "Arms and the Man" thematic analysis?


What are the anti-romantic situations in the act 2 of the bernard shaw's drama the arms and the man?

The anti-romantic situations in the Act 2 of Bernard Shaw's drama-the Arms and the Man include the arrival of Lieutenant Fredric Henry.


How George Bernard Shaw used ibsenism and feminism in his works?

George Bernard Shaw was influenced by Henrik Ibsen's realist dramas, particularly in their exploration of social issues and the roles of women. Shaw incorporated Ibsen's themes of individualism and societal critique into his own works, often challenging traditional gender roles and advocating for women's rights. His plays, such as "Mrs. Warren's Profession" and "Pygmalion," reflect feminist ideas by portraying strong female characters who seek autonomy and challenge patriarchal norms. Through wit and satire, Shaw highlighted the injustices faced by women while promoting the idea of self-determination and social reform.


What is a summary of Candida by George Bernard Shaw?

"Candida" by George Bernard Shaw is a play that explores the nature of marriage, love, and relationships through the character of Candida, a strong-willed and independent woman who must choose between her husband, a charismatic preacher, and a young poet who idolizes her. The play challenges traditional gender roles and societal expectations, ultimately leading to a surprising and thought-provoking conclusion.


Find major themes in 'arms and the man by Benard Shaw?

love,war,marriage,and class,distinction,are major themes of arms and the man.


Was Shia LaBeouf in the coffin in eagle eye?

Yes, Shia LaBeouf is in the film Eagle Eye. He plays the roles Jerry Shaw and Ethan Shaw.


Who is called mouth piece in arms and the man according to shaw?

In George Bernard Shaw's play "Arms and the Man," the character referred to as the "mouthpiece" is Sergius Saranoff. He represents the romanticized ideal of military heroism and is often portrayed as a figure who embodies the traditional notions of bravery and honor in war. However, Shaw uses Sergius to critique these ideals, contrasting his superficial glory with the harsh realities of combat. Through this character, Shaw highlights the absurdity of romanticizing war.