The internal conflicts are when Zaroff was bored with hunting and was looking for a new "thrill"
another one is when Rainsford is struggling with himself to stay calm when Zaroff nearly figures him out those few times.
Rainsford kills General Zaroff, therefore ending the hunt.
The climax is the turning point of the story. It mostly falls in the middle or at the end of the story. In other words it is when Rainsford changes his personality.
The climax is the turning point of the story. It mostly falls in the middle or at the end of the story. In other words it is when Rainsford changes his personality.
rainsford fights the general because he doesent want to go hunt people"
In "The Most Dangerous Game," Rainsford does not have a conflict with the character of Whitney. Whitney, Rainsford's hunting companion at the beginning of the story, shares a mutual understanding and respect for the sport of hunting. Their conversation reflects a camaraderie and similar perspective on the ethics of hunting, contrasting sharply with Rainsford's later conflict with General Zaroff.
if there is no fkn answer dont put uhp the bitxhass websight
In The Most Dangerous Game, the term "game" is used as a synonym for animals, prey. In this story, the game hunted are humans. Therefore, humans are "the most dangerous game".In the story, a big-game hunter is marooned on an island, and becomes the unwilling prey of another hunter.
No.
The climax of "Catch the Short Story" is when the protagonist, after a series of failed attempts, finally catches the elusive short story, representing a moment of triumph and resolution in the narrative. This is often the most intense and pivotal moment in the story, where the conflict reaches its peak before being resolved.
Rainsford
an island
ivan