Some more answers from our community:
Making the statement such as "Jesus' real existence is impossible" such as is made by one of these 'anti-Jesus' people (Remsberg), reveals the bias. To say something is impossible means that the author of such a statement has a criteria against which some things are possible and other things are deemed impossible. In other words he has a bias. Specifically, this often includes a bias against miracles and the supernatural.
G K Chesterton in addressing this type of issue said the following, and such a comment is still relevant today: 'The believers in miracles accept them (rightly or wrongly) because they have evidence for them. The disbelievers in miracles deny them (rightly or wrongly) because they have a doctrine against them.' G K Chesterton, Orthodoxy, ch.9, 'Authority and the Adventurer.'
Both; real and myth
No, Jesus was a real person. Zeus is from an ancient Roman myth. He is not real.
This is a question you may want to keep to yourself, as this is quite personal.
yes.....he was real not a myth
he wont, he's pretty dead. fact: Jesus is dead myth: Christianity is real
William Wallace was a real person.
Demeter can be a persons name, but the Demeter of Greek myth was a goddess not a person.
Tarrare was a real person, not a myth or legend. He was a Frenchman in the 18th century known for his insatiable appetite and unusual eating habits.
St. George was a real person but many of the things he is credited with doing are myths.
it is a un real myth or real myth get it myth-ologytype your answer here......
The Catholic Encyclopedia defines Freethinkers as "those who, abandoning the religious truths and moral dictates of the Christian Revelation, and accepting no dogmatic teaching on the ground of authority, base their beliefs on the unfettered findings of reason alone." So, Freethinkers are those who seek the truth about religion, rather than relying on dogmatic teaching. On this definition, not all Freethinkers belive that Jesus was a myth. Many believe that he was a real person who lived in the first century CE, although he was not divine and may not even heve intended to start a religious movement. Some, however, say that there is no real evidence that Jesus was a person. They point out that the earliest Christian writings, the Epistles of St. Paul, do not indicate that Paul really knew Jesus to be a person who had lived in the recent past. It is only with Mark's Gospel that Jesus is written of as a real person, but this Gospel is believed to have been written some forty years after the time attributed to Jesus. Scholars are debating whether or not Mark created the person of Jesus, to replace a mythical Jesus who had been worshipped by the very earliest Christians.
No the prodigal son was not a real person, he was used by Jesus in the parable of the prodigal son