The Conjurer succeded in his trails against the quickman, who disturbed himand the auduence in his each and every perform.At the last perform of the show he decided to take revange of the disturber. so he offered a trick with quickman's watch,collar, spectacles and dance. With the permission of the quickman, the conjurer broken his watch, burnt his collar,smashed his spectacles, and danced on his hat.He not only stopped with these tricks abut also with further permission painted striped on his overcoat in green or to tied his suspendedrs in a knot, and should delighgted to entertain the audience and the quickman. If the quickman doesn't argee, the performance could end.It reveals that the performer suceeded in performing his show.
The conjurer is the master of the magic show organised in the hall.He gives a perfect finish to each and every trick.The quick man's criticism makes his level of reputation below zero. Therefore the conjurer takes revenge on him.
I was going to comment with some snide remark but after a quick Google search it looks like it was.
A. I think you're talking about Quick Man, a character from the Mega Man video game. Quick Man was left bewildered when the conjurer made his most prized possession, the Quick Boomerang, disappear during a magic act. He couldn't believe the way the conjurer carelessly handled his cherished item. Quick Man got determined to find his weapon since he couldn't comprehend how the conjurer was able to make it vanish.
At Versailles what were the goals of revenge and compensation was most associated with
Of quick sense perceptions; keen-scented; skilled in following a trail., Hence, of quick intellectual perceptions; of keen penetration and judgment; discerning and judicious; knowing; far-sighted; shrewd; sage; wise; as, a sagacious man; a sagacious remark.
This is not a legal phrase. A 'rejoinder' is defined as, "A quick and witty response to a question, statement or remark." I've heard plenty of them in court but there is no legal "burden" to respond to, or make, one.
Of quick sense perceptions; keen-scented; skilled in following a trail., Hence, of quick intellectual perceptions; of keen penetration and judgment; discerning and judicious; knowing; far-sighted; shrewd; sage; wise; as, a sagacious man; a sagacious remark.
I think that it was justified because the Americans thought that it would be a quick and easy way to end the war. I also think that it was not justified because the Americans were not thinking about their actions or the people/children that would not die and just sufer for something that they might not of done.
Choleric? Melancholic? Phlegmatic? Sanguine?
The climax of "Goosebumps: Revenge of the Living Dummy" occurs when the protagonist, Amy, confronts the evil living dummy, Slappy, and manages to outsmart him by using her quick thinking and bravery to defeat him and save herself and her family from his sinister plans.
Laertes and Hamlet both seek revenge for their father's deaths, driven by deep emotional turmoil and a sense of injustice. Laertes is impulsive and quick to action, while Hamlet is more contemplative, grappling with existential questions and moral dilemmas. Despite their differing approaches, both characters ultimately face the consequences of their vengeful desires, highlighting the destructive nature of revenge. Their parallel journeys underscore the themes of honor, grief, and the tragic impact of revenge in Shakespeare's play.
The Conjurer wanted to teach the Quick man the lesson that it is foolish to rush into things without thinking them through carefully. He wanted to show that patience and careful planning are important in achieving success.