Gregory and Sampson show a disregard for the law by engaging in violent behavior and seeking to provoke conflict with others. They prioritize their loyalty to their master, the Capulet family, over following the law and maintaining peace in society. Their actions demonstrate a lack of respect for legal authority and a willingness to act outside the bounds of the law.
In this line from Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet," Sampson is questioning whether the law would support him if he provokes a fight by saying "ay." He is implying that if he asserts his intent to engage in a brawl, the law might favor him, suggesting a playful yet defiant attitude toward the legal consequences of their actions. This moment highlights the themes of honor and conflict that permeate the play.
In Act One, Scene 1, where Sampson bites his thumb, he is doing so towards both Abraham and Balthasar, two Montague servingmen. He does not admit this though in order to protect Gregory and himself from the law. If it was known that Sampson bit his thumb at the Montague servingmen and a quarrel was started, it would be considered his fault.
What attitude did people have to the law
what attitudes did people have towards the mixed marriages law
"The greatest discovery of any generation is that a human being can alter his life by altering his attitude" - William JamesorNo one can walk a mile without taking the first step.
Attitudes towards the law can vary greatly depending on the individual, their cultural background, personal beliefs, and socioeconomic factors. However, here are some common attitudes and responses people may have towards the law: Compliance Resistance Indifference Fear.....
Different people have different views
His name was Gregor Mendel, not Gregory. Yes. He developed several laws of heredity, which we call Mendel's laws. They are the law of dominance, law of segregation, and law of independent assortment.
Gregory J. Baldwin has written: 'An internship' -- subject(s): Wetlands, Management, Law and legislation
Bootleggers generally held a defiant attitude towards Prohibition and the authorities enforcing it. They viewed the government's ban on alcohol as an infringement on personal freedom and often engaged in illegal activities with a sense of rebellion. Many bootleggers saw themselves as entrepreneurs, capitalizing on the high demand for alcohol, while simultaneously expressing disdain for law enforcement and the legal system that sought to curb their operations. This attitude contributed to the widespread culture of resistance and lawlessness during the Prohibition era.
Creon displays a pragmatic and often dismissive attitude towards the gods, prioritizing the laws of the state and human authority over divine will. He believes that maintaining order and power is paramount, which leads him to defy the gods' edicts, particularly regarding burial rites. His hubris and insistence on human law ultimately lead to tragic consequences, highlighting the tension between divine authority and human governance. This attitude reflects a broader theme of the dangers of pride and the neglect of moral and spiritual obligations.
Gregory Wetstone has written: 'Institutional aspects of transported pollutants' -- subject(s): Air, Pollution, Law and legislation, Standards