answersLogoWhite

0

Elizabeth has already considered the issue and discussed it with her sister, Jane. She knows the arguments in favor of marriage for money, and has already rejected them. But Charlotte's arguments are really a set of ill considered repetitions of the ideas Elizabeth has rejected, almost to the point of parody.

Charlotte is trying to be rational about a subject with strong emotional implications. But even in her rationality, her thoughts are faulty. She says it is better to know as little as possible about one's mate's imperfections; can this really be true? And her argument is that it is not necessary to feel any emotional attraction to a person with whom she would spend her life; is this wise?

---------------

I partially disagree: the rules in Austen's time have been abandoned long ago, thankfully! Charlotte knew that she had only two assets: her relatively proper upbringing and her father's title (who was NOT a genuine gentleman, nevertheless, as he had been a merchant, so her connections were non-existent). As the only "envisage-able" career for a woman in her social position would have been to become a governess, she knew she simply had to marry. Being very lucid, she knew she was neither beautiful, nor very young, nor wealthy, so she would logically attract only a second-rate husband. If you are to swallow a disgusting medicine, what good would it do to smell and taste it for half an hour?? This does not mean I fully support her, merely that I understand her. Elisabeth did, too, but that did not prevent her from feeling sorry (and a little contemptuous) for her friend. She would have rather faced a lifetime of loneliness and relative poverty than to marry Mr. Collins, whereas to Charlotte this was a chance not to be missed! To Lizzie, love, mutual respect, trust and a profound knowledge of each other were prerequisites. She had seen her parents' marriage go down the drains because the only thing they once had in common - physical attraction - had long gone and was replaced by Mrs. Bennet's poor nerves and Mr' Bennet's books and silences. This is why she demanded much more from marriage, unlike many of the girls in her contemporary society.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is a sign of marriage?

A sign of marriage is happiness.


What was elizabeths view of marriage?

Lizzy's Bennet's ideal vision of marriage is one where, in addition to being in love with ones spouse, there is a mutual respect for each other, and a meeting of minds.


What is the value of a 1952 coin to commemorate Queen Elizabeths marriage?

Such a coin does not exist. Queen Elizabeth was married in 1947 and her Coronation was in 1953.


In a study of happiness in marriage participants were asked how long they had been married. the time they had been married would be a?

In the study of happiness in marriage, the time participants had been married would be considered an independent variable. This is because it is a factor that could influence the dependent variable, which in this case is the participants' reported happiness in their marriage. By examining the relationship between the length of marriage and happiness, researchers can assess how duration may affect marital satisfaction.


Is happiness or an intact marriage more important assuming that there is no abuse?

Answer I think happiness would be more important than having an intact marriage where one or both parties are not happy.


Why does Elizabeth disagree with Charlotte's assessment of marriage in pride and prejudice?

Elizabeth Bennet disagrees with Charlotte Lucas's assessment of marriage because she values love and personal happiness over societal expectations and financial security. While Charlotte sees marriage primarily as a practical arrangement for stability, having settled for Mr. Collins out of necessity, Elizabeth believes that a successful marriage must be based on mutual respect and affection. Elizabeth's strong principles lead her to reject the idea that marriage should merely serve economic or social purposes, emphasizing the importance of genuine emotional connection.


What was Elizabeths 1 problem and how did she solve it?

Elizabeth's had many problems with religion, other countries, marriage, taxes and money, the poor and Mary, queen of Scots.


What does They are seldom happy in marriage mean?

it means happiness should be with them forever


What if there is no happiness in marriage?

Answer If there is no happiness in a marriage the first thing you should do before calling it quits, is to try and find out where the happiness went. Surely the two of you were happy at one time. Where did it go, and why did it go where it is, questions you should ask before doing something you may regret the rest of your life.


Why is compatibility and background a strong for success and happiness in marriage?

I don't know h answer.


How can you use The Relations in the sentence?

The relations that you have with your in laws can bring happiness or misery to a marriage.


What is the best ideal to make marriage?

Love, Trust, Happiness ect ect