answersLogoWhite

0

A third person narrator can provide a broader perspective by revealing multiple characters' thoughts and actions, creating a more objective view of the story. This can enhance the reader's understanding of different viewpoints and motives within the narrative. Additionally, a third person narrator can create a sense of distance or intimacy, depending on the narrative style chosen.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Which question be best to help readers understand a story with a first person narrator?

The writer should ask himself, "How much should the narrator know about the story?".


What is the difference between narrator and writer?

A narrator is the voice that tells a story, while a writer is the person who creates that story through their writing. The narrator is a character within the story who conveys the events and emotions to the audience, while the writer is the person behind the scenes shaping the narrative.


What is authors narration?

Narrator is a participant in the story from 3d person point of view-author is just a writer of a book, with/without a narrator.


What situation might lead a writer to choose third person?

A writer might choose third person point of view to create a sense of objectivity and to provide a more expansive view of the story by being able to explore multiple characters' perspectives. It can also help to create a sense of detachment between the narrator and the characters, allowing for more flexibility in revealing information.


Why might a writer use a naive narrator?

To set up ironic situations in which the reader knows something the narrator does not.rominee kotaralovescody kotara


What is the position from which the writer tells the story?

The writer is the narrator of her/his story. From: Retold American Classics, volume 1 == ==


Why in English there are First and Third Person Narrators.. What about the Second Pesron Narrator... Why is it not existing?

If you can imagine two individuals talking to each other, the "first person" is the person speaking ("I/we"). The "second person" is the person listening ("you"). The "third person" is someone not involved in the communication ("he/she/they"). The first person narrator is a participant in the story. The third person narrator details the story of someone not included in the speaker/listener or writer/reader relationship. The second person narrator would be telling a story that occurred to the reader/listener. It remains to be seen how this can be done to tell a story.


What actors and actresses appeared in I Am the Writer - 2013?

The cast of I Am the Writer - 2013 includes: Artistikem as Narrator


What is the difference between a first-and third person narrator's effects on a reader and what advantages and disadvantages are there to each?

A first person narration in literature is written in the "I" form..I saw this, that. I met him. 1.Every scenes are perceived or narrated out as in one person's view or opinion. 2.Other characters opinion or views have no relevance here. 3.The writer is actually talking to us through first person narrative mode. Third person narration, each and every character is used in terms of 'he', 'she', 'they'. 1. It is the most flexible and comfortable narrative mode. 2.The narrator or writer may not be a part of the story, but simply narrates it. 3.The story is said in all the characters' perspectives.


What is an example of when a postmodern writer or the story's narrator begins to directly address the reader?

When a postmodern writer or the story's narrator begins to directly address the reader it is an example of metafiction, where the narrator intentionally exposes himself or herself as the author of the story.


What is a third person story called?

When a story is told by an observer, by someone who is not an identifiable character in the plot, that is known as a third person omniscient narrator. The third person omniscient point of view allows the writer to fully and limitlessly create an entire world of developed and dynamic characters.


What is one reason withholding information the narrator gives is sometimes more intelligent?

As an omniscient or semi-omniscient being or voice that merely relates the story to the audience, the narrator already KNOWS details of the story--since the narrator is the writer, whether the writer uses 1st, 2nd, or 3rd person voice. So I, as narrator-writer, might already know in the plot that a "good girl" character has a dark past in which she murdered her parents. But I, as writer-narrator, can withhold that information from the audience, or leave subtle hints about some (unnamed) event or circumstance in her story. The narrator's knowledge does NOT need to be dumped all at one time onto the pages. Withholding sets aside the narrator's knowledge (intelligence) in order to create surprise, suspense, and garner reader's interest in figuring out the plot.