Ronald Dworkin believed that civil disobedience can be a legitimate form of protest in a democratic society when individuals have exhausted all other avenues for achieving justice. He emphasized the importance of respecting the rule of law and engaging in civil disobedience only as a last resort to challenge unjust laws. Dworkin also argued that civil disobedience can help foster dialogue and create positive social change by drawing attention to moral principles that underlie laws.
Anarchists that think they can make a difference by committing localized acts of vandalism and civil disobedience view G-20 meetings as an optimal time to get their "message" across.
slavery is bad
Top view at sill level
Top view at sill level
It is possible to view photos taken during The Civil War by searching for them on photo sharing websites such as Tumblr and also going to the official Civil War website.
A civil marriage is to be a legal couple in the law's view, and the church marriage is to be legal with God 's laws.
his view was tht the south needed slaves to work their land
The Copperheads were the anti-war Democrats.
Thoreau believed in a higher moral law that transcends societal laws and conventions, and he saw justice as conforming to this higher moral standard. He argued that individuals have a duty to resist unjust laws through acts of civil disobedience in order to align themselves with this higher moral perspective and bring about positive social change.
No, it should be viewed as history. It was a civil war not unlike our own civil war.
If you are talking about the civil rights movement, then view the website in related links
Some view civil unions as an acceptable compromise inasmuch as they provide many or all of the benefits of marriage, but do not "redefine" marriage.Some view civil unions as a form of segregation in that they create an artificial distinction to appease opponents. The difference in vocabulary also creates confusion and leads to same-sex relationships being treated as inferior to heterosexual ones.Some view civil unions as an intermediary step on the way to marriage equality. They are willing to accept the temporary distinction in order to provide legal rights to same-sex couples as quickly as possible.Some view civil unions as the work of the Devil and an abomination before their lord.