Well, for one thing, myths are more traditional stories passed down from generation to generation than reliable historic resources, although it is accepted as history.
Oral sources are recordings or transcripts detailing the lives of a person or group. Oral history can allow you to gain insight into the lives of people who otherwise might not be in the historical record.
Each man was on differant sides of the war( to different perspectives)
They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
Well, if I were a Viking maiden, I'd marry Einar (Kirk Douglas) from the ancient movie!
It can sometimes be difficult to read the original texts. They are old and parts might be missing from them.
There have been a lot of Viking leaders in Norway. Here's a link that might be useful: http://vikings.heindorffhus.dk/frame-Norway.htm
The samurai... The reason why i said samurai is because even though the viking is 5'11 and the samurai is 5'3 the samurai has greater reflex, greater strength and greater intelligance.the viking has a slight chance of winning. The shield of the viking is very strong but it cant resist the samurais kanabo the kanabo is made out of pure oak and is 35 lb's it is very heavy it can break anything and can chip or damage the viking's shield not only is it to attack it can also be used as a shield. Tip:don't let size fool you samurai vs viking
The story is that the Viking chieftain Olaf Haraldsson (St Olaf) tore down the London Bridge in about 1009. It might be a myth.
p e n i s
Possibly Leif Ericsson
There is A chance of him making it. He might be Vlad the Viking. Check out the PHB, they might give you info: poptropica.wordpress.com
i think it did because it might startt war or something