0
If I were Madame Forestier in the story "The Necklace," I would have been more understanding and empathetic towards Mathilde when she returned the borrowed necklace. I would have reassured her that the necklace was actually a fake, preventing the years of hardship that Mathilde endured due to her assumption that it was real.
What else can I help you with?
Why don't the loisels tell mme forester that they lost the necklace?
The Loisels do not tell Madame Forestier that they lost the necklace because they were ashamed and afraid of the consequences. They were worried about how Madame Forestier would react to the news, given the value of the necklace and their inability to replace it. Additionally, they hoped they could somehow find a way to replace it without her ever finding out.
Why does Madame Loisel borrow a necklace from her friend Madame Forestier?
because she believes that her dress is not elegant enough and the necklace would make it evne more beautiful! she doesnt want to look poor and she wants to fulfil her desires by being (feeling) apart of an upper class!
Who is the main character in story - the necklace?
Mme Loisell, who borrows the thing from her (friend) Mme Forestier- which means Forester. Parks would not be a bad translation. In a sense MMe Forestier is the antagonist, though fatal pride- and maybe alcohol played a role. I think she ( Loisell) was drunk when she lost the necklace at the party.. and waited too long to report it... that would explain why she did not call up MMe Forestier when she first noticed the item ( which she believed to be worth 60 Grand plus) was missing.
Why don't the Loisels tell Mme. Forester that the necklace has been lost?
The reason she did not tell you is because you should have read the story
Who are the characters in 'The Necklace'?
Mr. and Mrs. Loisel, Mme Forestier ( owner of the necklace, who loans it out for Mme Loisel"s one night stand) miscellanous walk-on characters, people at the party, cab driver, etc. at no time did she have the common sense of calling up her friend and simply recounting everything that happened- which would have avoided much ( toil and trouble, not to mention money loss) The basic premise of a lost article figures in such social commentary tales as The Overcoat ( all of the money was Confederate), and watered down or turnabout plots, such as the (Super Car) a Detroit Dream car that figured in a plot in Bewitched and thanks to some Magic, was resolved happily- the car was returned to the Detroit custom shop where it was made, and the advertising executive ( who was driving the car when transmuted back to Detroit- seized on the idea of using it as an advertising prop ( he was selling sausages) it came out well, unlike the Necklace tale. listen folks- Observe and Heed article Nine from the Guy Upstairs....
What could you have done in the diamond necklace?
To improve the story "The Diamond Necklace," I could have added a twist ending where Madame Loisel discovers the necklace was actually fake, teaching her a valuable lesson about the importance of honesty and humility. This would have added depth to the story's moral and made it more thought-provoking for readers.
Who are the antagonist in the necklace?
The protagonist of the story is Mathilde Loisel. The antagonist can either be describe as her bad luck, greed, and pride or, some say, it could be describe as her friend Madame Forestier since she didn't tell her that the necklace was invaluable in the beginning. It depends on how the reader interprets the story.
Who is the protagonists in the necklace?
Mme Loisell, who borrows the thing from her (friend) Mme Forestier- which means Forester. Parks would not be a bad translation. In a sense MMe Forestier is the antagonist, though fatal pride- and maybe alcohol played a role. I think she ( Loisell) was drunk when she lost the necklace at the party.. and waited too long to report it... that would explain why she did not call up MMe Forestier when she first noticed the item ( which she believed to be worth 60 Grand plus) was missing.
How did Mme Forestier recognize Mme Loisel when they met in the Champs-Elysees?
She wants her to see what despair and trouble that necklace had cost her and want her to feel guilty but in the end she get a suprise #Sabrina
Who is the antagonist and who is the protagonist of Guy de Maupassant's The Necklace?
Madame Loisele is the protagonist, because she is the main character and the one with the conflict to overcome in the story. She wanted to impress everyone but instead she found out that the rich are not as careful at spending money as she is. She wanted to be a member of high class society even though she was not. She borrowed what she thought was an expensive necklace to prove that she belonged in high society. Then she lost it and lied about it to cover up the loss and wound up paying for her false pride and dishonesty by spending years in poverty paying for a necklace that was practically worthless.
What is the summary of 'The Necklace' by guy de maupassant?
Basically it's about this womans greed and how she completlely takes advantage of her husband, spending money on gowns and the sort. Then she asks her friend for some jewlery, she decides on this necklace and was so happy, then she ended up losing it, and instead of telling her friend she had lost it they spent all they money buying a replacement. Years later she is working as a maid, having lost her middle class status and she found her old friend. There she told her that the necklace as a fake, whereas the one she had replaced it with was a real one. Then she goes off and blames her friend for all her troubles and the current position she was in, when if she had just admitted she had lost the thing, she would have been fine.A:"The Necklace" tells the story of Madame Mathilde Loisel and her husband. When Mathilde was little, she always imagined herself in a high social position with wonderful jewels. However, when she grows up, she has nothing and marries a lowly clerk who is obsessed with making her happy.Through lots of begging at work, he is able to get two invitations to the Ministry of Education's party. Mathilde is upset, for she has nothing to wear. Using money that he was saving to buy a rifle, he lets Mathilde buy a fancy dress. Mathilde also wants jewels to wear with it. Since they have no money left, her husband suggests that she borrow something from her friend, Madame Jeanne Forestier. Mathilde picks out the fanciest jewel necklace that she can find. After attending the Ministry of Education's party, Mathilde finds out that she has lost the necklace.Mathilde and her husband then have to work for ten years to come up with the 36,000 francs to buy a replacement necklace. After losing everything, having to work, and forcing her husband to work two jobs, Mathilde sees Madame Forestier walking down the street and tells her that the necklace she returned to her was actually a replacement. Madame Forestier is surprised and tells Mathilde that the original necklace was actually a copy, worth only 500 francs.(from Wikipedia)Detached.
An example of foreshadowing in the story the necklace?
The only hint that the diamonds are fake can be detected in Mme. Forestier's reply to Mme. Loisel when she asks: "Will you lend me this, only this?" It would appear to the reader that she is asking to borrow the most expensive piece of jewelry in the whole collection. A necklace like that would cost at least $150,000 in present-day American dollars, possibly much more. Yet Mme. Forestier's reply might make an especially keen reader wonder. She replies: "Why, yes, certainly."
