0
The best evidence to support the claim that Montresor is insane is his meticulous planning and execution of Fortunato's murder without showing any remorse or guilt. Additionally, his enjoyment of inflicting pain and suffering on Fortunato further indicates his mental instability. Finally, his delusional belief that the murder was justified and necessary demonstrates a clear disconnect from reality.
What else can I help you with?
Is there evidence to support montresor claim that fortunato did infact injure and insult him?
No. Quite the contrary in fact - which promotes the reader to suspect that the narrator is insane.
What is the basic structure of an argument?
An argument typically consists of a claim, evidence to support that claim, and reasoning that explains how the evidence supports the claim. The claim is the main point being made, the evidence provides support or proof for the claim, and the reasoning connects the evidence to the claim.
What evidence do you have to support your claim, your honor?
The evidence presented in court, such as witness testimony, documents, and physical evidence, supports the claim being made by the party.
What question should a writer ask when choosing evidence to support a claim?
Is the evidence from the best source I can find
Which evidence best supports the claim that Montresor is insane in The Cask of Amontillado?
Montresor states that he has suffered a thousand insults and injuries from Fortunato and that he must have vengeance against him, so he planned Fortunato's murder. No details of these insults and injuries are ever given, leading the reader to wonder if they are all in Montresor's mind. Perhaps they never happened at all. This is reinforced by the fact that Fortunato greets Montresor in a very friendly way, offers to help Montresor decide if the wine is a true Amontillado and persists in going through the catacombs despite the dankness of the passageway. Even though Fortunato is driven by his own conceit as a connoisseur of wine, these actions are hardly the actions of a person who has committed thousands of insults and injuries.
When writing a character analysis about death of a salesman what should you do after finding textual evidence to support your claim?
explain how your evidence supports your claim
When writing a character analysis essay about Death of a Salesman what should you do after finding textual evidence to support your claim?
explain how your evidence supports your claim
What evidence supports the claim that nothing exists?
There is no concrete evidence that supports the claim that nothing exists. The absence of evidence for the existence of something does not prove that nothing exists. The concept of nothingness is often philosophical and abstract, rather than something that can be proven empirically.
What are the requirements for a cer?
A good claim that states your opinion/fact, strong evidence that supports your claim, and reasoning that shows a link between the claim and evidence. The most important parts, in my opinion, are the reasoning and evidence, but the claim is important too. After all, the claim is the base. The evidence is the top, and the reasoning is all the details that make it interesting and worthy of of attention.
When building an outline how should a writer categorize each piece of evidence?
According to the claim it supports
Why does the author claim without evidence?
Making claims without evidence undermines the credibility of the author's argument. Providing evidence supports the claim, makes the argument more convincing, and helps readers understand the basis of the statement.
What are the steps for writing a valid scientific explanation?
To write a valid scientific explanation, begin by clearly stating the claim, which is the main conclusion or answer to a specific question. Next, provide evidence that supports the claim, drawing from reliable data, observations, or experiments. Then, include reasoning that connects the evidence to the claim, explaining how the evidence supports your conclusion. Finally, ensure that the explanation is organized and concise, adhering to scientific conventions.
